• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Public Administration

Abruzzo

Comparative values by:

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

P - Poor

Rating

39 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

71/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Molise
33/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor* 3
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 6
PP+ - Good 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Administrative capacity Index: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Macro-indicator Average score of Public Administrations assessed Benchmark Public Administration for each macro-area Score of the Public Administration
Financial situation 56 91 47
Governance 56 82 31
Personnel management 54 95 46
Public services and relations with citizens 54 88 41
Public tenders and relations with suppliers 44 84 17
Environment 55 94 70

Administrative Capacity Index

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial situation

P+ - Weak

Rating

47 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

91/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Basilicata
20/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 2
P+ - Weak* 6
PP - Satisfactory 5
PP+ - Good 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Financial pressure per capita
  • Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues
  • New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities
  • Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds

Weaknesses

  • Financial autonomy
  • Collection capacity
  • Spending capacity
  • Debt per capita
  • EU funds management - effected payments

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial situation

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy 86.4 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 86.7 low | Low
2021 86.4 low | Low
Low
Financial pressure per capita 2,247.0 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 2168.5 high | High
2021 2247.0 high | High
High
Collection capacity 79.0 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 78.8 low | Low
2021 79.0 low | Low
Low
Spending capacity 79.26 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 75.9 low | Low
2021 79.26 low | Low
Low
Spending rigidity 4.65 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 4.6 medium | Medium
2021 4.65 medium | Medium
Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 96.33 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 101.4 low | Low
2021 96.33 high | High
High
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities 46.35 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 46.8 high | High
2021 46.35 high | High
High
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.0 high | High
2021 0.0 high | High
High
Debt per capita 1,551.63 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1538.5 low | Low
2021 1551.63 low | Low
Low
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -10.2 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.1 high | High
2021 -10.2 medium | Medium
Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 28.0 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 16.0 low | Low
2021 28.0 low | Low
Low

2 Governance

P - Poor

Rating

31 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Molise
Sardegna
30/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor* 5
P+ - Weak 3
PP - Satisfactory 3
PP+ - Good 8
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Public Real Estate properties - wide report

Weaknesses

  • Degree of digitization
  • Target achievement
  • Public works incompleted
  • Public Real Estate properties - management
  • Subsidiary companies

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Open data availability 342.0 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 330.0 medium | Medium
2021 342.0 medium | Medium
Medium
E- Government 9.0 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 10.8 medium | Medium
2021 9.0 medium | Medium
Medium
Degree of digitization 0.36 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Target achievement 98.4 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 99.65 medium | Medium
2021 98.4 low | Low
Low
Smart Working 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Public works incompleted 6.31 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 5.31 low | Low
2021 6.31 low | Low
Low
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 1,111.0 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 10.0 high | High
2021 1111.0 high | High
High
Public Real Estate properties - management -1.89 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Subsidiary companies 44.44 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 13.2 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 16.8 high | High
2021 13.2 medium | Medium
Medium
Court of Auditors - update 1.0 4
Year Value Evaluation
Medium

3 Personnel management

P+ - Weak

Rating

46 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Lombardia
95/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
23/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 4
P+ - Weak* 5
PP - Satisfactory 5
PP+ - Good 4
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure

Weaknesses

  • Average age

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expenditure 55.44 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 56.3 medium | Medium
2021 55.44 medium | Medium
Medium
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 2.27 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 2.3 medium | Medium
2021 2.27 medium | Medium
Medium
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0.02 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.2 medium | Medium
2021 0.02 high | High
High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 1.34 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 3.5 low | Low
2021 1.34 medium | Medium
Medium
Average age 55.9 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 55.4 low | Low
2021 55.9 low | Low
Low
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 44.41 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) 8.71 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 9.9 low | Low
2021 8.71 medium | Medium
Medium
Managers on population 0.47 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 98.04 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 81.1 high | High
2021 98.04 medium | Medium
Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0.0 0
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.0 low | Low
2021 0.0 nd | N.A.
N.A.

4 Public services and relations with citizens

P+ - Weak

Rating

41 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

88/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 6
P+ - Weak* 4
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good 5
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Integrated home care services
  • Accredited private health care centers
  • FOIA register: accepted requests

Weaknesses

  • Hospital emigration
  • Beds in nursing homes (BES)
  • Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services and relations with citizens

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Online services 18.2 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 15.6 medium | Medium
2021 18.2 medium | Medium
Medium
Landline high-speed internet access covering 16.4 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Hospital emigration 16.6 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Beds in nursing homes (BES) 42.0 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Integrated home care services 3.8 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 3.6 high | High
2021 3.8 high | High
High
Accredited private health care centers 1.0 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.1 high | High
2021 1.0 high | High
High
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita 147.6 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 14718.62 low | Low
2021 147.6 low | Low
Low
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 1.5 3
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Citizens involvement 2.6 3
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
FOIA register: accepted requests 94.7 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 94.23 high | High
2021 94.7 high | High
High
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 22.81 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 13.87 high | High
2021 22.81 medium | Medium
Medium

5 Public tenders and relations with suppliers

F - Fallible

Rating

17 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
84/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
44/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
17/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible* 1
P - Poor 9
P+ - Weak 3
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good 3
PPP - Very Good 1
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

Weaknesses

  • Recurring contractors in direct procurements
  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - number
  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount
  • Per capita debt amount vs suppliers
  • Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders and relations with suppliers

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 14.49 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 13.08 high | High
2021 14.49 low | Low
Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 79.21 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 79.72 low | Low
2021 79.21 low | Low
Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 79.99 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 47.24 low | Low
2021 79.99 low | Low
Low
Timeliness of payments indicator 16.0 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 23.01 medium | Medium
2021 16.0 medium | Medium
Medium
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers 136.27 2
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens 8.56 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.

6 Environment

PP+ - Good

Rating

70 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
94/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
55/100
Worst score
Liguria
18/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 1
P - Poor 3
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good* 6
PPP - Very Good 1
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Land consumption
  • Contaminated sites
  • Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering
  • Renewable energy

Weaknesses

  • Population exposed to landslide risk

Indicators of the macro-indicator Environment

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 77.8 6
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Land consumption 5.0 12
Year Value Evaluation
High
Contaminated sites 0.6 12
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.3 medium | Medium
2021 0.6 high | High
High
Urban waste disposal into dump 34.4 7
Year Value Evaluation
2020 37.7 medium | Medium
2021 34.4 medium | Medium
Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 5.0 12
Year Value Evaluation
2020 5.11 medium | Medium
2021 5.0 high | High
High
Population exposed to landslide risk 5.8 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 5.8 low | Low
2021 5.8 low | Low
Low
Population exposed to flood risk 6.1 6
Year Value Evaluation
2020 6.1 medium | Medium
2021 6.1 medium | Medium
Medium
Renewable energy 51.0 14
Year Value Evaluation
2020 51.0 high | High
2021 51.0 high | High
High