• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P+ - Weak
43/100

Macro-indicators list

P - Poor
38/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 89.0 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 5,022.5 1 Low
Collection capacity 84.2 10 High
Spending capacity 75.8 1 Low
Spending rigidity 5.4 4 Medium
Per capita debt from financing 834.5 4 Medium
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0 N.A.
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 110.4 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 84.8 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 6.2 4 Medium
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -96.7 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 75.0 4 Medium

P - Poor
29/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 110.0 1 Low
Degree of digitalization 0.8 4 Medium
Performance 0 N.A.
Working from home (WFH) 0 N.A.
Public Real Estate properties - report 100.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - management -1.1 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 50.0 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 8.8 5 Medium
Service outsourcing 4.0 5 Medium
Efficiency indicator - reporting 10.0 3 Medium
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 10.0 3 Medium
Average completion time for public works 1.9 1 Medium
Compliance with public works supervision 56.0 4 Medium

P+ - Weak
44/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 151.9 1 Low
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 2.3 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 1.3 5 Medium
Average age 54.3 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 42.0 4 Medium
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 18.1 1 Low
Average of training days 0.4 5 Medium
Total managers on total personnel 3.0 10 High
Women managers on total managers 42.9 4 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 97.6 4 Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

P - Poor
38/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 30.4 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 0 N.A.
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 0 N.A.
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 171.3 8 High
Hospital migration 5.5 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 50.2 1 Low
Integrated Home Care services 0 N.A.
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.0 8 High
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 12.1 1 Low
Essential levels of care - prevention area 61.6 1 Low
Essential levels of care - territorial area 49.3 1 Low
Essential levels of care - hospital area 58.7 1 Low
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 100.0 8 High

PP+ - Good
64/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 51.0 8 High
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 11.5 4 Medium
Timeliness of payments indicator -37.1 20 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 3.5 8 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.5 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 72.0 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 51.0 8 Medium

PP+ - Good
63/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 6.1 12 High
Land consumption 3.3 12 High
Contaminated sites 12.4 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 27.9 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 3.4 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 39.0 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.3 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk 7.5 5 Medium
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 0 N.A.