• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Public Administration

Lombardia

Comparative values by:

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

PP+ - Good

Rating

64 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

71/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Molise
33/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 3
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 6
PP+ - Good* 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Administrative capacity Index: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Macro-indicator Average score of Public Administrations assessed Benchmark Public Administration for each macro-area Score of the Public Administration
Financial situation 56 91 67
Governance 56 82 75
Personnel management 54 95 95
Public services and relations with citizens 54 88 71
Public tenders and relations with suppliers 44 84 23
Environment 55 94 37

Administrative Capacity Index

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial situation

PP+ - Good

Rating

67 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

91/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Basilicata
20/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 2
P+ - Weak 6
PP - Satisfactory 5
PP+ - Good* 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Financial autonomy
  • Financial pressure per capita
  • Spending rigidity
  • Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues
  • New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities
  • Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds

Weaknesses

  • Collection capacity
  • EU funds management - effected payments

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial situation

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy % 94.21 High score for high values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 94.0 high | Alto
2021 94.21 high | Alto
Alto
Financial pressure per capita € p.c. 2,267.59 High score for low values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 2212.6 high | Alto
2021 2267.59 high | Alto
Alto
Collection capacity % 83.46 High score for high values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 84.0 medium | Medium
2021 83.46 low | Basso
Basso
Spending capacity % 86.14 High score for high values 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 76.4 low | Basso
2021 86.14 medium | Medium
Medium
Spending rigidity % 0.94 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.0 high | Alto
2021 0.94 high | Alto
Alto
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues % 96.19 High score for high values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 102.8 low | Basso
2021 96.19 high | Alto
Alto
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities % 39.61 High score for low values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 41.3 high | Alto
2021 39.61 high | Alto
Alto
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds % 0.0 High score for low values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.0 high | Alto
2021 0.0 high | Alto
Alto
Debt per capita € p.c. 1,088.89 High score for low values 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1227.1 medium | Medium
2021 1088.89 medium | Medium
Medium
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita € p.c. -2.8 High score for high values 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.6 high | Alto
2021 -2.8 medium | Medium
Medium
EU funds management - effected payments % 34.0 High score for high values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 19.0 medium | Medium
2021 34.0 low | Basso
Basso

2 Governance

PP+ - Good

Rating

75 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Molise
Sardegna
30/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 5
P+ - Weak 3
PP - Satisfactory 3
PP+ - Good* 8
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Open data availability
  • E- Government
  • Target achievement
  • Public Real Estate properties - wide report
  • Public Real Estate properties - management
  • Anti-corruption measures undertaken
  • Court of Auditors - update

Weaknesses

  • Public works incompleted
  • Subsidiary companies

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Open data availability value 8,052.2 High score for high values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 15044.0 high | Alto
2021 8052.2 high | Alto
Alto
E- Government value 26.0 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 10.0 medium | Medium
2021 26.0 high | Alto
Alto
Degree of digitization value 0.66 High score for high values 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 3.3 low | Basso
2021 0.66 medium | Medium
Medium
Target achievement value 112.8 High score for high values 12
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Smart Working value 10.0 High score for high values 4
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Public works incompleted % 5.83 High score for low values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 3.11 medium | Medium
2021 5.83 low | Basso
Basso
Public Real Estate properties - wide report value 1,111.0 High score for high values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 10.0 high | Alto
2021 1111.0 high | Alto
Alto
Public Real Estate properties - management € p.c. 0.11 High score for high values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.13 high | Alto
2021 0.11 high | Alto
Alto
Subsidiary companies % 40.0 High score for high values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 87.5 high | Alto
2021 40.0 low | Basso
Basso
Anti-corruption measures undertaken value 112.8 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 19.2 high | Alto
2021 112.8 high | Alto
Alto
Court of Auditors - update value 2.0 High score for low values 8
Year Value Evaluation
Alto

3 Personnel management

PPP+ - Excellent

Rating

95 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Lombardia
95/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
23/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 4
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 5
PP+ - Good 4
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent* 1

Strengths

  • Per capita personnel expenditure
  • Personnel expenditure on current expenditure
  • Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure
  • Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel
  • Average age
  • Average days of absence (sick leave)
  • Managers on population
  • Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers
  • Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers

Weaknesses

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expenditure € p.c. 15.77 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 16.1 high | Alto
2021 15.77 high | Alto
Alto
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure % 0.68 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.7 high | Alto
2021 0.68 high | Alto
Alto
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure % 0.0 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.2 medium | Medium
2021 0.0 high | Alto
Alto
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel % 0.34 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.4 high | Alto
2021 0.34 high | Alto
Alto
Average age years old 53.02 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 52.0 high | Alto
2021 53.02 high | Alto
Alto
Personnel with a degree on total personnel % 43.65 High score for high values 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) average days 6.91 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 6.2 high | Alto
2021 6.91 high | Alto
Alto
Managers on population 0.13 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers % 84.87 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 93.2 medium | Medium
2021 84.87 high | Alto
Alto
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers value 160.14 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 22.5 low | Basso
2021 160.14 high | Alto
Alto

4 Public services and relations with citizens

PP+ - Good

Rating

71 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

88/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 6
P+ - Weak 4
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good* 5
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable)
  • Online services
  • Landline high-speed internet access covering
  • Hospital emigration
  • Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties
  • Citizens involvement
  • FOIA register: accepted requests
  • FOIA register: average time of reply to requests

Weaknesses

  • Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services and relations with citizens

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) code 2.0 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) code High score for high values 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.D.
Online services value 45.5 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 68.0 high | Alto
2021 45.5 high | Alto
Alto
Landline high-speed internet access covering % 32.1 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Hospital emigration % 4.5 High score for low values 8
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Beds in nursing homes (BES) 85.4 High score for high values 4
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Integrated home care services % 2.6 High score for high values 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 3.0 medium | Medium
2021 2.6 medium | Medium
Medium
Accredited private health care centers value 2.46 High score for low values 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 2.4 medium | Medium
2021 2.46 medium | Medium
Medium
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita € p.c. 140.3 High score for low values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 13691.53 medium | Medium
2021 140.3 low | Basso
Basso
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties value 4.5 High score for high values 6
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Citizens involvement value 4.5 High score for high values 6
Year Value Evaluation
2020 4.8 medium | Medium
2021 4.5 high | Alto
Alto
FOIA register: accepted requests % 94.7 High score for high values 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 88.57 medium | Medium
2021 94.7 high | Alto
Alto
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests days 18.31 High score for low values 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 21.91 medium | Medium
2021 18.31 high | Alto
Alto

5 Public tenders and relations with suppliers

P - Poor

Rating

23 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
84/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
44/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
17/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 1
P - Poor* 9
P+ - Weak 3
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good 3
PPP - Very Good 1
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Timeliness of payments indicator

Weaknesses

  • Recurring contractors in direct procurements
  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - number
  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount
  • Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders and relations with suppliers

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements % 10.0 High score for low values 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 17.86 low | Basso
2021 10.0 low | Basso
Basso
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number % 20.11 High score for low values 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 6.72 medium | Medium
2021 20.11 low | Basso
Basso
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount % 9.44 High score for low values 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.02 medium | Medium
2021 9.44 low | Basso
Basso
Timeliness of payments indicator average days -18.14 High score for low values 16
Year Value Evaluation
2020 -12.51 high | Alto
2021 -18.14 high | Alto
Alto
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers High score for low values 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.D.
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens value High score for low values 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.D.
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year % 42.02 High score for high values 1
Year Value Evaluation
Basso

6 Environment

P - Poor

Rating

37 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
94/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
55/100
Worst score
Liguria
18/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 1
P - Poor* 3
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good 6
PPP - Very Good 1
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Urban waste disposal into dump
  • Population exposed to landslide risk

Weaknesses

  • Air quality - PM 2.5
  • Land consumption
  • Contaminated sites
  • Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering
  • Renewable energy

Indicators of the macro-indicator Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 97.0 High score for low values 1
Year Value Evaluation
Basso
Land consumption % 12.1 High score for low values 1
Year Value Evaluation
Basso
Contaminated sites thousandths 7.8 High score for low values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.7 high | Alto
2021 7.8 low | Basso
Basso
Urban waste disposal into dump % 4.2 High score for low values 14
Year Value Evaluation
2020 4.3 high | Alto
2021 4.2 high | Alto
Alto
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 12.1 High score for low values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 13.01 low | Basso
2021 12.1 low | Basso
Basso
Population exposed to landslide risk % 0.5 High score for low values 12
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.5 high | Alto
2021 0.5 high | Alto
Alto
Population exposed to flood risk % 4.4 High score for low values 6
Year Value Evaluation
2020 4.4 medium | Medium
2021 4.4 medium | Medium
Medium
Renewable energy % 24.0 High score for high values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 24.0 low | Basso
2021 24.0 low | Basso
Basso