• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Public Administration

Molise

Compare
Comparative values by:
Download report
Download all data

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

P - Poor

Rating

33 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
71/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Molise
33/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Administrative capacity Index: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Administrative Capacity Index

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial situation

P - Poor
Download all data

Rating

39 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
91/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Basilicata
20/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues
  • Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds

Weaknesses

  • Financial autonomy
  • Collection capacity
  • Spending capacity
  • Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita
  • EU funds management - effected payments

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial situation

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy % 80.37 High score for high values 1 Basso
Financial pressure per capita € p.c. 2,488.3 High score for low values 4 Medium
Collection capacity % 74.68 High score for high values 1 Basso
Spending capacity % 77.55 High score for high values 1 Basso
Spending rigidity % 5.79 High score for low values 5 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues % 96.83 High score for high values 8 Alto
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities % 55.36 High score for low values 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds % 0.14 High score for low values 8 Alto
Debt per capita € p.c. 1,436.26 High score for low values 5 Medium
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita € p.c. -97.17 High score for high values 1 Basso
EU funds management - effected payments % 34.0 High score for high values 1 Basso

2 Governance

P - Poor
Download all data

Rating

30 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
Piemonte
82/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Molise
Sardegna
30/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • E- Government
  • Court of Auditors - update

Weaknesses

  • Degree of digitization
  • Public Real Estate properties - management
  • Subsidiary companies
  • Anti-corruption measures undertaken

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Open data availability value High score for high values 0 N.D.
E- Government value 16.8 High score for high values 10 Alto
Degree of digitization value 0.46 High score for high values 1 Basso
Target achievement value High score for high values 0 N.D.
Smart Working value 10.0 High score for high values 4 Medium
Public works incompleted % 2.43 High score for low values 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - wide report value 0.0 High score for high values 0 N.D.
Public Real Estate properties - management € p.c. -1.89 High score for high values 1 Basso
Subsidiary companies % 60.0 High score for high values 1 Basso
Anti-corruption measures undertaken value 10.2 High score for high values 1 Basso
Court of Auditors - update value 2.0 High score for low values 8 Alto

3 Personnel management

P - Poor
Download all data

Rating

23 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Lombardia
95/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
23/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

Weaknesses

  • Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel
  • Average age
  • Personnel with a degree on total personnel

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expenditure € p.c. 111.87 High score for low values 5 Medium
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure % 3.77 High score for low values 5 Medium
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure % High score for low values 0 N.D.
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel % 14.84 High score for low values 1 Basso
Average age years old 58.81 High score for low values 1 Basso
Personnel with a degree on total personnel % 33.91 High score for high values 1 Basso
Average days of absence (sick leave) average days 7.87 High score for low values 5 Medium
Managers on population ‱ 0.73 High score for low values 5 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers % High score for low values 0 N.D.
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers value High score for high values 0 N.D.

4 Public services and relations with citizens

P - Poor
Download all data

Rating

24 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
88/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Integrated home care services

Weaknesses

  • Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable)
  • Landline high-speed internet access covering
  • Hospital emigration
  • Citizens involvement

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services and relations with citizens

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) code High score for high values 0 N.D.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) code 0.0 High score for high values 1 Basso
Online services value High score for high values 0 N.D.
Landline high-speed internet access covering % 6.4 High score for high values 1 Basso
Hospital emigration % 28.6 High score for low values 1 Basso
Beds in nursing homes (BES) ‱ 69.5 High score for high values 4 Medium
Integrated home care services % 5.1 High score for high values 8 Alto
Accredited private health care centers value 2.46 High score for low values 4 Medium
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita € p.c. 130.2 High score for low values 4 Medium
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties value High score for high values 0 N.D.
Citizens involvement value 1.3 High score for high values 1 Basso
FOIA register: accepted requests % High score for high values 0 N.D.
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests days High score for low values 0 N.D.

5 Public tenders and relations with suppliers

P - Poor
Download all data

Rating

24 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
84/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
44/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
17/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

Weaknesses

  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount
  • Timeliness of payments indicator
  • Per capita debt amount vs suppliers
  • Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens
  • Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders and relations with suppliers

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements % 20.0 High score for low values 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number % 70.45 High score for low values 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount % 37.95 High score for low values 2 Basso
Timeliness of payments indicator average days 123.46 High score for low values 2 Basso
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers € 372.86 High score for low values 2 Basso
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens value 20.36 High score for low values 1 Basso
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year % 0.0 High score for high values 1 Basso

6 Environment

PP+ - Good
Download all data

Rating

76 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
94/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
55/100
Worst score
Liguria
18/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Air quality - PM 2.5
  • Land consumption
  • Contaminated sites
  • Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering
  • Population exposed to flood risk
  • Renewable energy

Weaknesses

  • Urban waste disposal into dump
  • Population exposed to landslide risk

Indicators of the macro-indicator Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 33.3 High score for low values 12 Alto
Land consumption % 3.9 High score for low values 12 Alto
Contaminated sites thousandths 0.3 High score for low values 12 Alto
Urban waste disposal into dump % 90.0 High score for low values 1 Basso
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 3.9 High score for low values 12 Alto
Population exposed to landslide risk % 6.5 High score for low values 1 Basso
Population exposed to flood risk % 1.4 High score for low values 12 Alto
Renewable energy % 89.2 High score for high values 14 Alto