• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Administration

P.A. Bolzano

Comparative values by:

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

PP - Satisfactory

Rating

54 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

71/100
Average score of the administrations
53/100
Worst score
Molise
33/100

Distribution of Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 3
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory* 6
PP+ - Good 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Administrative capacity: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Macro-indicator Average score of the reference bodies Benchmark scores of the reference bodies Score of the Organization
Financial Report 56 91 43
Governance 56 82 61
Personnel management 54 95 39
Public services 54 88 59
Public tenders 44 84 38
Enviroment 55 94 94

Administrative Capacity

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial Report

P+ - Weak

Rating

43 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

91/100
Average score of the administrations
56/100
Worst score
Basilicata
20/100

Distribution of Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 2
P+ - Weak* 6
PP - Satisfactory 5
PP+ - Good 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Collection capacity
  • Debt per capita

Weaknesses

  • Financial stability per capita
  • Spending rigidity
  • Current expenditure and loan repayments on current revenues
  • Current liabilities from total liabilities
  • Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial Report

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy 90.48 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 91.2 medium | Medium
2021 90.48 medium | Medium
Medium
Financial stability per capita 9,316.95 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 9284.8 low | Low
2021 9316.95 low | Low
Low
Collection capacity 91.65 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 91.2 high | High
2021 91.65 high | High
High
Spending capacity 86.66 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 89.8 high | High
2021 86.66 medium | Medium
Medium
Spending rigidity 19.12 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 18.6 low | Low
2021 19.12 low | Low
Low
Current expenditure and loan repayments on current revenues 80.83 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 122.9 high | High
2021 80.83 low | Low
Low
Current liabilities from total liabilities 66.58 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 66.5 low | Low
2021 66.58 low | Low
Low
Investments financed by debt 3.65 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.3 medium | Medium
2021 3.65 medium | Medium
Medium
Debt per capita 344.66 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 287.4 high | High
2021 344.66 high | High
High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -617.67 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 -509.7 low | Low
2021 -617.67 low | Low
Low
Percentage of payments actually effected from community funds 45.0 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 18.8 medium | Medium
2021 45.0 medium | Medium
Medium

2 Governance

PP+ - Good

Rating

61 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Average score of the administrations
56/100
Worst score
Molise
Sardegna
30/100

Distribution of Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 5
P+ - Weak 3
PP - Satisfactory 3
PP+ - Good* 8
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • E- Government
  • Degree of digitization
  • Percentage of public works completed on time
  • Management of public assets
  • Main Findings of the Court of Auditors

Weaknesses

  • Open data availability
  • Publication and compliance of agreed targets
  • Deficit/surplus of rental property per capita

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Open data availability 300.0 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 890.0 high | High
2021 300.0 low | Low
Low
E- Government 22.8 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 120.0 high | High
2021 22.8 high | High
High
Degree of digitization 1.28 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 28.5 high | High
2021 1.28 high | High
High
Publication and compliance of agreed targets 0.0 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 100.0 medium | Medium
2021 0.0 low | Low
Low
Smart Working 10.0 4
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Percentage of public works completed on time 0.0 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.0 high | High
2021 0.0 high | High
High
Management of public assets 1,111.0 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 6.0 medium | Medium
2021 1111.0 high | High
High
Deficit/surplus of rental property per capita -5.71 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 -8.36 low | Low
2021 -5.71 low | Low
Low
Level of accountability of the subsidiary companies 60.0 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 78.95 medium | Medium
2021 60.0 medium | Medium
Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 11.4 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 15.6 medium | Medium
2021 11.4 medium | Medium
Medium
Main Findings of the Court of Auditors 2.0 8
Year Value Evaluation
High

3 Personnel management

P - Poor

Rating

39 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Lombardia
95/100
Average score of the administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
23/100

Distribution of Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor* 4
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 5
PP+ - Good 4
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Incidence of expenses for external advisory on personnel expenditure
  • Average age (years)
  • Average days of absence (days/person)

Weaknesses

  • Per capita personnel expense (€ p.c.)
  • Personnel expenditure incidence on current expenses
  • Percentage of personnel without fixed-term contract
  • Percentage of managers to Population

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expense (€ p.c.) 1,941.85 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 237.0 low | Low
2021 1941.85 low | Low
Low
Personnel expenditure incidence on current expenses 23.41 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 2.9 low | Low
2021 23.41 low | Low
Low
Incidence of expenses for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0.0 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 4.8 low | Low
2021 0.0 high | High
High
Percentage of personnel without fixed-term contract 21.41 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 4.2 low | Low
2021 21.41 low | Low
Low
Average age (years) 48.38 10
Year Value Evaluation
High
Percentage of personnel with a degree 43.16 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Average days of absence (days/person) 2.8 10
Year Value Evaluation
High
Percentage of managers to Population 7.45 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Provided rewards out of allocated ones to managers (%) 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Degree of differentiation of premiums paid to managers 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.

4 Public services

PP - Satisfactory

Rating

59 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

88/100
Average score of the administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 6
P+ - Weak 4
PP - Satisfactory* 4
PP+ - Good 5
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Proceedings and services
  • Hospital emigration
  • Beds in nursing homes
  • Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita

Weaknesses

  • Integrated home care services
  • Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties
  • Citizens involvement
  • FOIA access register: accepted requests

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Proceedings and services 2.0 10
Year Value Evaluation
High
Efficiency indicators: timing supervision and/or reporting 2.0 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Online services 19.5 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 13.0 high | High
2021 19.5 medium | Medium
Medium
Landline high-speed internet access covering 20.0 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Hospital emigration 4.9 8
Year Value Evaluation
High
Beds in nursing homes 111.7 8
Year Value Evaluation
High
Integrated home care services 0.2 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.0 nd | N.A.
2021 0.2 low | Low
Low
Accredited private health care centers 2.48 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 2.41 medium | Medium
2021 2.48 medium | Medium
Medium
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita 90.1 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 8256.4 high | High
2021 90.1 high | High
High
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 1.0 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Citizens involvement 1.3 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 12.0 high | High
2021 1.3 low | Low
Low
FOIA access register: accepted requests 78.3 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 77.78 medium | Medium
2021 78.3 medium | Medium
Medium
FOIA access register: average time of reply to requests 22.56 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 21.22 medium | Medium
2021 22.56 medium | Medium
Medium

5 Public tenders

P - Poor

Rating

38 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
84/100
Average score of the administrations
44/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
17/100

Distribution of Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 1
P - Poor* 9
P+ - Weak 3
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good 3
PPP - Very Good 1
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Indicator of prompt payments
  • Discharge of commercial debts arisen during the fiscal year

Weaknesses

  • Recurring contractors in direct procurements
  • Percentage of direct procurements on global public tenders - number

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 43.38 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 42.24 low | Low
2021 43.38 low | Low
Low
Percentage of direct procurements on global public tenders - number 81.08 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 79.93 low | Low
2021 81.08 low | Low
Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders per amount 24.42 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 26.11 medium | Medium
2021 24.42 medium | Medium
Medium
Indicator of prompt payments -10.0 16
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.64 medium | Medium
2021 -10.0 high | High
High
Total amount of debts vs suppliers per capita 9.42 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Number of credit companies per 10k citizens 2.67 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Discharge of commercial debts arisen during the fiscal year 85.69 10
Year Value Evaluation
High

6 Enviroment

PPP+ - Excellent

Rating

94 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
94/100
Average score of the administrations
55/100
Worst score
Liguria
18/100

Distribution of Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 1
P - Poor 3
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good 6
PPP - Very Good 1
PPP+ - Excellent* 1

Strengths

  • Land consumption
  • Contaminated sites
  • Urban waste disposal into dump
  • Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering
  • Population exposed to landslide risk
  • Population exposed to flood risk
  • Renewable energy

Weaknesses

Indicators of the macro-indicator Enviroment

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 83.3 6
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Land consumption 2.7 12
Year Value Evaluation
High
Contaminated sites 0.2 12
Year Value Evaluation
High
Urban waste disposal into dump 1.3 14
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.3 high | High
2021 1.3 high | High
High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 2.8 12
Year Value Evaluation
2020 4.29 high | High
2021 2.8 high | High
High
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.6 12
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.6 high | High
2021 1.6 high | High
High
Population exposed to flood risk 2.0 12
Year Value Evaluation
2020 2.0 high | High
2021 2.0 high | High
High
Renewable energy 180.7 14
Year Value Evaluation
2020 180.7 high | High
2021 180.7 high | High
High