• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Public Administration

Piemonte

Comparative values by:

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

PP+ - Good

Rating

64 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

71/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Molise
33/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 3
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 6
PP+ - Good* 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Administrative capacity Index: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Macro-indicator Average score of Public Administrations assessed Benchmark Public Administration for each macro-area Score of the Public Administration
Financial situation 56 91 55
Governance 56 82 82
Personnel management 54 95 66
Public services and relations with citizens 54 88 71
Public tenders and relations with suppliers 44 84 40
Environment 55 94 53

Administrative Capacity Index

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial situation

PP - Satisfactory

Rating

55 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

91/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Basilicata
20/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 2
P+ - Weak 6
PP - Satisfactory* 5
PP+ - Good 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Spending rigidity
  • New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities

Weaknesses

  • EU funds management - effected payments

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial situation

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy % 91.99 High score for high values 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 91.6 medium | Medium
2021 91.99 medium | Medium
Medium
Financial pressure per capita € p.c. 2,403.54 High score for low values 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 2327.9 medium | Medium
2021 2403.54 medium | Medium
Medium
Collection capacity % 86.55 High score for high values 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 81.6 low | Basso
2021 86.55 medium | Medium
Medium
Spending capacity % 86.2 High score for high values 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 77.5 low | Basso
2021 86.2 medium | Medium
Medium
Spending rigidity % 2.81 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 3.5 medium | Medium
2021 2.81 high | Alto
Alto
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues % 94.97 High score for high values 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 103.2 low | Basso
2021 94.97 medium | Medium
Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities % 38.83 High score for low values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 41.7 high | Alto
2021 38.83 high | Alto
Alto
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds % 6.27 High score for low values 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 9.9 low | Basso
2021 6.27 medium | Medium
Medium
Debt per capita € p.c. 1,239.01 High score for low values 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1240.8 medium | Medium
2021 1239.01 medium | Medium
Medium
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita € p.c. -12.55 High score for high values 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 -11.8 medium | Medium
2021 -12.55 medium | Medium
Medium
EU funds management - effected payments % 35.0 High score for high values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 21.0 high | Alto
2021 35.0 low | Basso
Basso

2 Governance

PPP - Very Good

Rating

82 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Molise
Sardegna
30/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 5
P+ - Weak 3
PP - Satisfactory 3
PP+ - Good 8
PPP - Very Good* 2
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Open data availability
  • E- Government
  • Degree of digitization
  • Smart Working
  • Public works incompleted
  • Public Real Estate properties - wide report
  • Subsidiary companies
  • Anti-corruption measures undertaken
  • Court of Auditors - update

Weaknesses

  • Target achievement
  • Public Real Estate properties - management

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Open data availability value 1,172.6 High score for high values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 749.0 medium | Medium
2021 1172.6 high | Alto
Alto
E- Government value 20.4 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 20.0 high | Alto
2021 20.4 high | Alto
Alto
Degree of digitization value 0.99 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 9.9 high | Alto
2021 0.99 high | Alto
Alto
Target achievement value 0.0 High score for high values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 125.0 medium | Medium
2021 0.0 low | Basso
Basso
Smart Working value 11.0 High score for high values 8
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Public works incompleted % 1.7 High score for low values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 2.38 medium | Medium
2021 1.7 high | Alto
Alto
Public Real Estate properties - wide report value 1,111.0 High score for high values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 10.0 high | Alto
2021 1111.0 high | Alto
Alto
Public Real Estate properties - management € p.c. -1.64 High score for high values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 -1.56 low | Basso
2021 -1.64 low | Basso
Basso
Subsidiary companies % 94.44 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 100.0 high | Alto
2021 94.44 high | Alto
Alto
Anti-corruption measures undertaken value 15.6 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 10.0 low | Basso
2021 15.6 high | Alto
Alto
Court of Auditors - update value 2.0 High score for low values 8
Year Value Evaluation
Alto

3 Personnel management

PP+ - Good

Rating

66 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Lombardia
95/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
23/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 4
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 5
PP+ - Good* 4
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Per capita personnel expenditure
  • Personnel expenditure on current expenditure
  • Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel
  • Average days of absence (sick leave)
  • Managers on population

Weaknesses

  • Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expenditure € p.c. 45.0 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 44.4 medium | Medium
2021 45.0 high | Alto
Alto
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure % 1.83 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.8 medium | Medium
2021 1.83 high | Alto
Alto
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure % High score for low values 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.D.
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel % 0.0 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.0 high | Alto
2021 0.0 high | Alto
Alto
Average age years old 54.41 High score for low values 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 51.1 high | Alto
2021 54.41 medium | Medium
Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel % 46.17 High score for high values 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) average days 5.64 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 6.0 high | Alto
2021 5.64 high | Alto
Alto
Managers on population 0.22 High score for low values 10
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers % 98.7 High score for low values 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 98.6 low | Basso
2021 98.7 medium | Medium
Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers value 28.41 High score for high values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 26.2 low | Basso
2021 28.41 low | Basso
Basso

4 Public services and relations with citizens

PP+ - Good

Rating

71 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

88/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 6
P+ - Weak 4
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good* 5
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable)
  • Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable)
  • Online services
  • Landline high-speed internet access covering
  • Hospital emigration
  • Beds in nursing homes (BES)
  • Citizens involvement

Weaknesses

  • Accredited private health care centers

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services and relations with citizens

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) code 2.0 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 111.0 high | Alto
2021 2.0 high | Alto
Alto
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) code 2.0 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1111.0 high | Alto
2021 2.0 high | Alto
Alto
Online services value 19.5 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 13.0 high | Alto
2021 19.5 high | Alto
Alto
Landline high-speed internet access covering % 34.7 High score for high values 10
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Hospital emigration % 6.7 High score for low values 8
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Beds in nursing homes (BES) 115.5 High score for high values 8
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Integrated home care services % 2.7 High score for high values 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 3.3 medium | Medium
2021 2.7 medium | Medium
Medium
Accredited private health care centers value 3.33 High score for low values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 3.19 low | Basso
2021 3.33 low | Basso
Basso
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita € p.c. 121.8 High score for low values 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 12559.93 medium | Medium
2021 121.8 medium | Medium
Medium
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties value High score for high values 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.D.
Citizens involvement value 6.5 High score for high values 6
Year Value Evaluation
2020 2.4 medium | Medium
2021 6.5 high | Alto
Alto
FOIA register: accepted requests % High score for high values 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.D.
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests days High score for low values 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.D.

5 Public tenders and relations with suppliers

P+ - Weak

Rating

40 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
84/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
44/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
17/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 1
P - Poor 9
P+ - Weak* 3
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good 3
PPP - Very Good 1
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Per capita debt amount vs suppliers

Weaknesses

  • Recurring contractors in direct procurements
  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - number
  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders and relations with suppliers

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements % 20.77 High score for low values 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 20.43 medium | Medium
2021 20.77 low | Basso
Basso
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number % 80.04 High score for low values 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 78.74 low | Basso
2021 80.04 low | Basso
Basso
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount % 64.87 High score for low values 2
Year Value Evaluation
2020 61.87 low | Basso
2021 64.87 low | Basso
Basso
Timeliness of payments indicator average days 7.74 High score for low values 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 6.46 medium | Medium
2021 7.74 medium | Medium
Medium
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers 1.02 High score for low values 16
Year Value Evaluation
Alto
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens value 0.52 High score for low values 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year % 92.63 High score for high values 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium

6 Environment

PP - Satisfactory

Rating

53 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
94/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
55/100
Worst score
Liguria
18/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 1
P - Poor 3
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory* 4
PP+ - Good 6
PPP - Very Good 1
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Urban waste disposal into dump
  • Population exposed to landslide risk

Weaknesses

  • Air quality - PM 2.5
  • Contaminated sites

Indicators of the macro-indicator Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 88.6 High score for low values 1
Year Value Evaluation
Basso
Land consumption % 6.7 High score for low values 6
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Contaminated sites thousandths 42.6 High score for low values 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 35.5 low | Basso
2021 42.6 low | Basso
Basso
Urban waste disposal into dump % 12.0 High score for low values 14
Year Value Evaluation
2020 14.9 high | Alto
2021 12.0 high | Alto
Alto
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 6.7 High score for low values 6
Year Value Evaluation
2020 6.78 medium | Medium
2021 6.7 medium | Medium
Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 1.6 High score for low values 12
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.6 high | Alto
2021 1.6 high | Alto
Alto
Population exposed to flood risk % 4.8 High score for low values 6
Year Value Evaluation
2020 4.8 medium | Medium
2021 4.8 medium | Medium
Medium
Renewable energy % 41.8 High score for high values 7
Year Value Evaluation
2020 41.8 medium | Medium
2021 41.8 medium | Medium
Medium