• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Public Administration

Sicilia

Compare
Comparative values by:
Download Report All data

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

P+ - Weak

Rating

41 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
70/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
52/100
Worst score
Molise
32/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Administrative capacity Index: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Administrative Capacity Index

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial situation

F - Fallible
Download All data

Rating

15 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
79/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
51/100
Worst score
Sicilia
15/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita

Weaknesses

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial situation

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy % n.d. High score for high values 0 Trend not available N.A.
Financial pressure per capita € p.c. n.d. High score for low values 0 Trend not available N.A.
Collection capacity % n.d. High score for high values 0 Trend not available N.A.
Spending capacity % n.d. High score for high values 0 Trend not available N.A.
Spending rigidity % n.d. High score for low values 0 Trend not available N.A.
Debt per capita € p.c. n.d. High score for low values 0 Trend not available N.A.
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues % n.d. High score for high values 0 Trend not available N.A.
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities % n.d. High score for low values 0 Trend not available N.A.
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds % n.d. High score for low values 0 Trend not available N.A.
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita € p.c. 0.86 High score for high values 10 High
EU funds management - effected payments % 43.0 High score for high values 5 Medium

2 Governance

P+ - Weak
Download All data

Rating

46 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
78/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
55/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Target achievement

Weaknesses

  • Public Real Estate properties - management
  • Subsidiary companies

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
E- Government value 21.0 High score for high values 6 Medium
Degree of digitization value 0.19 High score for high values 6 Medium
Target achievement value 111.0 High score for high values 12 High
Smart Working value 10.0 High score for high values 5 Medium
Public works incompleted numero 1.0 High score for low values 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - report value 11.0 High score for high values 5 Trend not available Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management € p.c. -3.14 High score for high values 1 Low
Subsidiary companies ABS 66.67 High score for high values 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken value 15.6 High score for high values 6 Medium

3 Personnel management

P - Poor
Download All data

Rating

30 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
74/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
48/100
Worst score
Molise
28/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers
  • Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers

Weaknesses

  • Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants
  • Average age
  • Personnel with a degree on total personnel
  • Average days of absence (sick leave)
  • Total managers on total personnel
  • Women managers on total managers
  • Average of training days

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expenditure € p.c. n.d. High score for low values 0 Trend not available N.A.
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants val./1.000 residents 2.49 High score for low values 1 Trend not available Low
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel % 2.19 High score for low values 5 Medium
Average age years 56.68 High score for low values 1 Low
Personnel with a degree on total personnel % 25.01 High score for high values 1 Low
Average days of absence (sick leave) average days 20.87 High score for low values 1 Low
Total managers on total personnel % 7.46 High score for low values 1 Trend not available Low
Women managers on total managers % 30.51 High score for high values 1 Trend not available Low
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers % 68.1 High score for low values 8 High
Average of training days average days 0.2 High score for high values 1 Trend not available Low
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers variance 309.18 High score for high values 10 High

4 Public services and relations with citizens

P+ - Weak
Download All data

Rating

48 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Toscana
90/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
51/100
Worst score
Calabria
Molise
Campania
23/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Landline high-speed internet access covering
  • Integrated home care services
  • Citizens involvement

Weaknesses

  • Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants
  • Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants
  • Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services and relations with citizens

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) value 11.0 High score for high values 5 Trend not available Medium
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) value 11.0 High score for high values 5 Trend not available Medium
Landline high-speed internet access covering % 29.6 High score for high values 10 High
Hospital emigration % 5.9 High score for low values 5 Medium
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants v/ 10k inhabitants 52.8 High score for high values 1 Low
Integrated home care services % 3.9 High score for high values 10 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants v/ 10k inhabitants 2.78 High score for low values 1 Low
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita € p.c. 15.0 High score for low values 1 Low
Citizens involvement value 9.1 High score for high values 10 High
FOIA register: accepted requests % n.d. High score for high values 0 Trend not available N.A.

5 Public tenders and relations with suppliers

PP - Satisfactory
Download All data

Rating

53 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
Umbria
86/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
18/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Recurring contractors in direct procurements
  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount
  • Timeliness of payments indicator

Weaknesses

  • Per capita debt amount vs suppliers
  • Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders and relations with suppliers

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements % 13.29 High score for low values 14 Trend not available High
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number % 50.77 High score for low values 7 Trend not available Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount % 0.18 High score for low values 14 Trend not available High
Timeliness of payments indicator days -3.38 High score for low values 16 High
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers € p.c. 20.31 High score for low values 1 Low
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens v/ 10k inhabitants 4.6 High score for low values 1 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year % n.d. High score for high values 0 Trend not available N.A.

6 Environment

PP - Satisfactory
Download All data

Rating

56 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
77/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Toscana
Liguria
29/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Air quality - PM 2.5
  • Population exposed to landslide risk
  • Population exposed to flood risk

Weaknesses

  • Urban waste disposal into dump
  • Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources

Indicators of the macro-indicator Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 50.0 High score for low values 12 High
Land consumption % 6.52 High score for low values 6 Medium
Contaminated sites thousandths 3.2 High score for low values 6 Medium
Urban waste disposal into dump % 58.9 High score for low values 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 6.5 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 1.8 High score for low values 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk % 2.6 High score for low values 12 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 26.0 High score for high values 1 Low