• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P+ - Weak
42/100

Macro-indicators list

P+ - Weak
44/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 86.6 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 2,599.1 4 Medium
Collection capacity 68.7 1 Low
Spending capacity 71.6 1 Low
Spending rigidity 2.3 8 High
Debt per capita 819.7 4 Medium
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.6 1 Low
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 103.7 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 64.6 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -5.4 4 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 56.0 1 Low

P - Poor
35/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 119.0 8 High
Degree of digitalization 0.2 1 Low
Performance 10.0 1 Low
Working from home (WFH) 100.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - report 111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - management -2.0 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 33.3 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 8.0 5 Medium
Service outsourcing 4.6 1 Low
Efficiency indicator - reporting 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 0 N.A.
Average completion time for public works 0.8 4 High
Compliance with public works supervision 35.0 4 Medium

P - Poor
36/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 50.2 5 Medium
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 1.0 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 1.0 5 Medium
Average age 54.5 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 51.6 4 Medium
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 15.5 4 Medium
Average of training days 0.0 1 Low
Total managers on total personnel 4.8 1 Low
Women managers on total managers 43.3 4 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 154.5 1 Low
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0.0 1 Low

P+ - Weak
49/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 40.7 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 165.5 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 3.1 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 16.8 1 Low
Hospital migration 14.9 1 Low
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 43.1 1 Low
Integrated Home Care services 4.7 8 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 1.0 8 High
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 12.5 1 Low
Essential levels of care - prevention area 77.7 4 Medium
Essential levels of care - territorial area 68.5 4 Medium
Essential levels of care - hospital area 69.3 4 Medium
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 100.0 8 High

P - Poor
35/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 87.2 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 23.6 4 Medium
Timeliness of payments indicator 74.0 2 Low
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 10.9 8 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 11.2 2 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 34.8 2 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 86.2 16 High

PP+ - Good
61/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 81.8 6 Medium
Land consumption 5.0 12 High
Contaminated sites 0.6 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill 27.5 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 5.1 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 45.9 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 5.6 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 7.2 5 Medium
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 14.6 6 Medium