• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P - Poor
28/100

Macro-indicators list

F - Fallible
8/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 0 N.A.
Financial pressure per capita 0 N.A.
Collection capacity 0 N.A.
Spending capacity 0 N.A.
Spending rigidity 0 N.A.
Debt per capita 0 N.A.
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0 N.A.
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 0 N.A.
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 0 N.A.
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0 N.A.
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -18.5 4 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 76.0 4 Medium

P - Poor
25/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 104.0 4 Medium
Degree of digitalization 0 N.A.
Performance 0 N.A.
Working from home (WFH) 100.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - report 100.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - management 0.0 4 Medium
Subsidiary companies 66.7 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 4.4 1 Low
Service outsourcing 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - reporting 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 10.0 3 Medium
Average completion time for public works 1.0 2 Medium
Compliance with public works supervision 65.0 8 High

P - Poor
31/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 0 N.A.
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 1.9 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 0.2 10 High
Average age 56.8 1 Low
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 45.5 4 Medium
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 13.8 4 Medium
Average of training days 0.0 1 Low
Total managers on total personnel 4.1 5 Medium
Women managers on total managers 26.8 1 Low
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 0 N.A.
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

P - Poor
36/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 26.9 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 0 N.A.
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 0 N.A.
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 0 N.A.
Hospital migration 26.9 1 Low
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 75.1 3 Medium
Integrated Home Care services 3.9 8 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 1.7 8 High
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 13.2 1 Low
Essential levels of care - prevention area 79.6 4 Medium
Essential levels of care - territorial area 64.2 1 Low
Essential levels of care - hospital area 63.7 1 Low
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 100.0 8 High

F - Fallible
18/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 72.7 4 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 8.8 4 Medium
Timeliness of payments indicator 11.1 10 Medium
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 0 N.A.
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0 N.A.
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 0 N.A.
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 0 N.A.

PP+ - Good
63/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 8.3 12 High
Land consumption 3.2 12 High
Contaminated sites 4.0 5 Medium
Urban waste disposal at landfill 44.0 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 3.2 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 111.5 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk 7.0 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 1.1 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 0 N.A.