• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
68/100

Macro-indicators list

PP+ - Good
79/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 90.6 8 High
Financial pressure per capita 2,644.1 4 Medium
Collection capacity 79.8 5 Medium
Spending capacity 86.1 10 High
Spending rigidity 1.9 8 High
Debt per capita 264.4 8 High
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.0 8 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 103.7 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 67.4 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -22.6 4 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 103.0 8 High

PP+ - Good
65/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 110.0 1 Low
Degree of digitalization 0.3 1 Low
Performance 111.0 8 High
Working from home (WFH) 111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report 100.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - management -2.3 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 130.0 8 High
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 8.8 5 Medium
Service outsourcing 1.9 10 High
Efficiency indicator - reporting 11.0 6 High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 11.0 6 High
Average completion time for public works 1.1 2 Medium
Compliance with public works supervision 61.0 8 High

PPP - Very Good
87/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 38.8 10 High
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 0.8 10 High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 2.3 5 Medium
Average age 51.5 10 High
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 67.0 8 High
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 11.8 8 High
Average of training days 1.9 10 High
Total managers on total personnel 2.8 10 High
Women managers on total managers 45.6 8 High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 100.0 4 Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 85.2 4 Medium

PP+ - Good
67/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 36.1 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 127.3 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 13.7 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 48.2 4 Medium
Hospital migration 5.1 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 94.1 3 Medium
Integrated Home Care services 3.6 8 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 3.4 1 Low
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 9.2 6 High
Essential levels of care - prevention area 90.7 8 High
Essential levels of care - territorial area 96.0 8 High
Essential levels of care - hospital area 94.5 8 High
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 93.2 4 Medium

PP+ - Good
65/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 82.5 4 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 66.4 1 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator -14.2 20 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 2.0 8 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.2 16 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 75.5 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 59.5 8 Medium

P - Poor
37/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 87.2 1 Low
Land consumption 8.9 1 Low
Contaminated sites 1.7 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill 7.5 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 9.0 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 20.5 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk 2.0 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk 62.5 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 15.6 6 Medium