• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP - Satisfactory
52/100

Macro-indicators list

PP+ - Good
60/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 88.4 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 5,479.6 1 Low
Collection capacity 91.3 10 High
Spending capacity 86.4 10 High
Spending rigidity 3.5 4 Medium
Per capita debt from financing 434.9 8 High
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.0 4 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 127.9 8 High
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 89.3 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 17.0 1 Low
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -76.1 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 101.0 8 High

P+ - Weak
42/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 110.0 1 Low
Degree of digitalization 0.8 4 Medium
Performance 111.0 8 High
Working from home (WFH) 110.0 8 High
Public real estate properties - report 110.0 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management -0.5 4 Medium
Subsidiary companies 92.9 4 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 5.5 1 Low
Service outsourcing 4.4 5 Medium
Efficiency indicator - reporting 1.0 1 Low
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 0 N.A.
Average completion time for public works 2.0 1 Medium
Compliance with public works supervision 16.0 1 Low

P - Poor
36/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 150.1 1 Low
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 2.8 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 3.6 5 Medium
Average age 52.9 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 48.7 4 Medium
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 19.9 1 Low
Average of training days 0.1 1 Low
Total managers on total personnel 3.3 10 High
Women managers on total managers 41.3 4 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 0 N.A.
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

PP+ - Good
66/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 44.2 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 262.1 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 78.7 8 High
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 77.6 4 Medium
Hospital migration 6.7 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 117.9 6 High
Integrated Home Care services 3.1 4 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 1.5 8 High
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 10.3 3 Medium
Essential levels of care - prevention area 85.3 8 High
Essential levels of care - territorial area 79.4 4 Medium
Essential levels of care - hospital area 78.2 4 Medium
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 0.0 1 Low

PP+ - Good
62/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 57.7 8 High
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 2.4 8 High
Timeliness of payments indicator -17.2 20 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 4.8 8 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 2.1 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 64.9 2 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 57.9 8 Medium

P+ - Weak
48/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 88.0 1 Low
Land consumption 8.0 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 18.4 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 5.2 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 8.1 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 31.5 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 0.4 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk 9.9 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 41.9 6 Medium