• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP - Satisfactory
58/100

Macro-indicators list

PP+ - Good
68/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 90.5 8 High
Financial pressure per capita 2,448.1 8 High
Collection capacity 75.1 1 Low
Spending capacity 78.8 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 0.9 8 High
Per capita debt from financing 170.4 8 High
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.0 4 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 102.1 1 Low
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 41.1 8 High
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita 0.0 8 High
EU funds management - effected payments 59.0 1 Low

PP - Satisfactory
52/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 112.0 8 High
Degree of digitalization 0.3 1 Low
Performance 11.0 4 Medium
Working from home (WFH) 100.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - report 110.0 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management 0.1 8 High
Subsidiary companies 75.0 4 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 8.8 5 Medium
Service outsourcing 2.9 5 Medium
Efficiency indicator - reporting 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 0 N.A.
Average completion time for public works 0.8 4 High
Compliance with public works supervision 63.0 8 High

PP - Satisfactory
58/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 16.0 10 High
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 0.3 10 High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 0.3 10 High
Average age 52.6 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 46.3 4 Medium
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 17.8 1 Low
Average of training days 0.3 5 Medium
Total managers on total personnel 5.6 1 Low
Women managers on total managers 42.1 4 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 87.4 4 Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 168.7 4 Medium

PP - Satisfactory
55/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 45.1 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 146.9 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 4.6 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 18.1 1 Low
Hospital migration 4.9 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 84.8 3 Medium
Integrated Home Care services 2.8 4 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.4 4 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 12.4 1 Low
Essential levels of care - prevention area 86.8 8 High
Essential levels of care - territorial area 93.1 8 High
Essential levels of care - hospital area 85.3 8 High
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 92.9 4 Medium

PP+ - Good
73/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 80.0 4 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 93.0 1 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator -15.9 20 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 0.0 16 High
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.0 16 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 75.7 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 53.3 8 Medium

P - Poor
38/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 97.1 1 Low
Land consumption 12.1 1 Low
Contaminated sites 8.2 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 3.6 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 12.4 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 24.4 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk 0.5 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk 4.4 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 7.2 1 Low