• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P - Poor
28/100

Macro-indicators list

F - Fallible
6/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 0 N.A.
Financial pressure per capita 0 N.A.
Collection capacity 0 N.A.
Spending capacity 0 N.A.
Spending rigidity 0 N.A.
Debt per capita 0 N.A.
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 2.9 1 Low
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 0 N.A.
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 0 N.A.
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0 N.A.
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -150.1 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 67.0 4 Medium

P - Poor
21/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 0 N.A.
Degree of digitalization 0.5 4 Medium
Performance 0 N.A.
Working from home (WFH) 0 N.A.
Public Real Estate properties - report 0 N.A.
Public Real Estate properties - management -1.6 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 0 N.A.
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 2.0 1 Low
Service outsourcing 0.2 10 High
Efficiency indicator - reporting 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 0 N.A.
Average completion time for public works 0.9 4 High
Compliance with public works supervision 21.0 1 Low

P - Poor
27/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 0 N.A.
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 1.6 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 3.3 5 Medium
Average age 56.1 1 Low
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 40.6 1 Low
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 9.4 8 High
Average of training days 0.1 1 Low
Total managers on total personnel 6.1 1 Low
Women managers on total managers 41.4 4 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 100.0 1 Low
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

P - Poor
36/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 40.4 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 0 N.A.
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 0 N.A.
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 0 N.A.
Hospital migration 29.2 1 Low
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 65.0 3 Medium
Integrated Home Care services 2.9 4 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.6 4 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 11.0 3 Medium
Essential levels of care - prevention area 83.0 4 Medium
Essential levels of care - territorial area 65.4 4 Medium
Essential levels of care - hospital area 48.5 1 Low
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 100.0 8 High

P - Poor
28/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 64.8 8 High
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 0.8 8 High
Timeliness of payments indicator 69.5 2 Low
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 0 N.A.
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0 N.A.
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 58.0 2 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 60.3 8 Medium

PP+ - Good
68/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 50.0 12 High
Land consumption 3.9 12 High
Contaminated sites 0.3 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill 90.4 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 3.9 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 85.1 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk 6.1 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 2.3 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 0 N.A.