• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP - Satisfactory
55/100

Macro-indicators list

PP+ - Good
63/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 88.4 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 9,665.8 1 Low
Collection capacity 93.1 10 High
Spending capacity 85.6 10 High
Spending rigidity 20.0 1 Low
Per capita debt from financing 692.6 4 Medium
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.1 4 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 117.7 8 High
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 58.4 8 High
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 14.0 4 Medium
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -579.6 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 85.0 8 High

P+ - Weak
40/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 118.0 8 High
Degree of digitalization 1.0 4 Medium
Performance 10.0 1 Low
Working from home (WFH) 111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report 111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - management -9.3 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 82.7 4 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 7.0 1 Low
Service outsourcing 4.7 1 Low
Efficiency indicator - reporting 1.0 1 Low
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 0 N.A.
Average completion time for public works 1.0 2 Medium
Compliance with public works supervision 19.0 1 Low

P+ - Weak
42/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 2,139.6 1 Low
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 34.0 1 Low
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 18.3 1 Low
Average age 48.7 10 High
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 25.5 1 Low
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 18.8 1 Low
Average of training days 0.2 1 Low
Total managers on total personnel 2.4 10 High
Women managers on total managers 44.4 8 High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 96.8 4 Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 143.3 4 Medium

PP+ - Good
60/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 12.3 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 547.5 8 High
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 112.1 8 High
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 265.8 8 High
Hospital migration 4.6 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 116.1 6 High
Integrated Home Care services 0.4 1 Low
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.8 4 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 7.4 6 High
Essential levels of care - prevention area 52.0 1 Low
Essential levels of care - territorial area 68.0 4 Medium
Essential levels of care - hospital area 80.7 4 Medium
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 0.0 1 Low

PP+ - Good
70/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 94.5 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 38.0 1 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator -5.6 20 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 1.1 8 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.9 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 88.6 16 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 82.5 16 High

PP+ - Good
66/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 100.0 1 Low
Land consumption 0 N.A.
Contaminated sites 0.3 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill 1.4 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 2.7 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 192.7 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk 2.3 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk 9.8 5 Medium
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 101.8 12 High