• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP - Satisfactory
59/100

Macro-indicators list

PP - Satisfactory
56/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 85.1 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 2,511.1 4 Medium
Collection capacity 79.0 5 Medium
Spending capacity 78.4 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 3.8 4 Medium
Per capita debt from financing 2,088.7 1 Low
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.0 8 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 103.3 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 56.5 8 High
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -6.6 4 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 60.0 1 Low

P+ - Weak
49/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 115.0 8 High
Degree of digitalization 0 N.A.
Performance 10.0 1 Low
Working from home (WFH) 0 N.A.
Public real estate properties - report 111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - management -1.3 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 108.3 8 High
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 8.8 5 Medium
Service outsourcing 0.5 10 High
Efficiency indicator - reporting 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 0 N.A.
Average completion time for public works 0 N.A.
Compliance with public works supervision 84.0 8 High

PP+ - Good
69/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 40.5 10 High
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 0.7 10 High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 3.3 5 Medium
Average age 58.3 1 Low
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 50.5 4 Medium
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 12.4 8 High
Average of training days 0.7 10 High
Total managers on total personnel 3.6 5 Medium
Women managers on total managers 40.0 4 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 90.6 8 High
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 125.1 4 Medium

PP+ - Good
60/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 45.8 8 High
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 132.9 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 9.5 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 59.2 4 Medium
Hospital migration 6.3 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 116.9 6 High
Integrated Home Care services 2.0 1 Low
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 3.6 1 Low
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 10.0 6 High
Essential levels of care - prevention area 86.1 8 High
Essential levels of care - territorial area 84.5 8 High
Essential levels of care - hospital area 81.4 4 Medium
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 66.1 1 Low

PP+ - Good
72/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 86.8 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 51.8 1 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator -3.5 20 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 0.5 16 High
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.3 16 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 88.6 16 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 48.9 2 Low

PP - Satisfactory
51/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 87.5 1 Low
Land consumption 6.7 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 42.7 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 12.2 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 7.0 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 36.9 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.9 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk 4.9 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 23.8 6 Medium