• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P+ - Weak
48/100

Macro-indicators list

PP - Satisfactory
59/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 64.3 1 Low
Financial pressure per capita 1,857.4 8 High
Collection capacity 72.8 1 Low
Spending capacity 74.0 1 Low
Spending rigidity 1.8 8 High
Per capita debt from financing 312.9 8 High
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.1 4 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 103.4 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 68.1 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -38.2 4 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 98.0 8 High

P+ - Weak
47/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 110.0 1 Low
Degree of digitalization 0.0 1 Low
Performance 11.0 4 Medium
Working from home (WFH) 111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report 111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - management -0.2 4 Medium
Subsidiary companies 20.0 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 9.9 10 High
Service outsourcing 3.5 5 Medium
Efficiency indicator - reporting 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 0 N.A.
Average completion time for public works 1.8 1 Medium
Compliance with public works supervision 31.0 4 Medium

PP - Satisfactory
59/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 37.6 10 High
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 0.6 10 High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 0.0 10 High
Average age 54.2 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 49.1 4 Medium
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 19.2 1 Low
Average of training days 2.4 10 High
Total managers on total personnel 5.1 1 Low
Women managers on total managers 46.7 8 High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 0 N.A.
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

P - Poor
28/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 34.4 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 131.9 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 8.9 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 43.6 4 Medium
Hospital migration 8.4 4 Medium
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 39.9 1 Low
Integrated Home Care services 1.9 1 Low
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 3.0 1 Low
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 12.0 1 Low
Essential levels of care - prevention area 67.9 1 Low
Essential levels of care - territorial area 61.7 1 Low
Essential levels of care - hospital area 79.8 4 Medium
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 70.2 1 Low

PP - Satisfactory
55/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 88.8 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 0.5 8 High
Timeliness of payments indicator -7.5 20 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 2.2 8 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.8 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 77.2 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 44.3 2 Low

P+ - Weak
47/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 69.2 6 Medium
Land consumption 8.2 1 Low
Contaminated sites 6.5 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 28.1 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 8.2 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 55.3 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.4 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk 3.4 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 8.4 1 Low