• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P - Poor
34/100

Macro-indicators list

F - Fallible
6/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 0 N.A.
Financial pressure per capita 0 N.A.
Collection capacity 0 N.A.
Spending capacity 0 N.A.
Spending rigidity 0 N.A.
Debt per capita 0 N.A.
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 1.2 1 Low
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 0 N.A.
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 0 N.A.
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0 N.A.
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -8.2 4 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 59.0 1 Low

P - Poor
35/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 107.0 4 Medium
Degree of digitalization 12.0 8 High
Performance 110.0 4 Medium
Working from home (WFH) 100.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - report 0 N.A.
Public Real Estate properties - management -6.5 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 0 N.A.
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 9.9 10 High
Service outsourcing 3.2 5 Medium
Efficiency indicator - reporting 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 0 N.A.
Average completion time for public works 1.9 1 Medium
Compliance with public works supervision 26.0 1 Low

P - Poor
34/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 0 N.A.
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 2.5 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 0.0 10 High
Average age 57.5 1 Low
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 27.0 1 Low
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 19.4 1 Low
Average of training days 0.6 5 Medium
Total managers on total personnel 7.0 1 Low
Women managers on total managers 31.2 1 Low
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 72.4 8 High
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 15.4 1 Low

P+ - Weak
42/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 47.5 8 High
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 0 N.A.
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 0 N.A.
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 0 N.A.
Hospital migration 6.2 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 51.4 1 Low
Integrated Home Care services 4.3 8 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.8 4 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 11.2 3 Medium
Essential levels of care - prevention area 45.5 1 Low
Essential levels of care - territorial area 62.2 1 Low
Essential levels of care - hospital area 75.3 4 Medium
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 80.0 4 Medium

P+ - Weak
46/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 84.3 4 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 2.7 8 High
Timeliness of payments indicator -7.2 20 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 38.1 2 Low
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 8.0 2 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 81.4 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 33.3 2 Low

P+ - Weak
40/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 66.0 6 Medium
Land consumption 6.5 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 3.2 5 Medium
Urban waste disposal at landfill 51.5 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 6.5 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 28.0 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.8 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk 2.6 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 0 N.A.