• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP - Satisfactory
51/100

Macro-indicators list

PP - Satisfactory
56/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 94.6 8 High
Financial pressure per capita 11,564.2 1 Low
Collection capacity 78.8 5 Medium
Spending capacity 90.6 10 High
Spending rigidity 16.7 1 Low
Debt per capita 1,183.0 1 Low
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.0 4 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 129.7 8 High
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 84.6 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -328.8 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 111.0 8 High

P+ - Weak
48/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 104.0 4 Medium
Degree of digitalization 1.4 4 Medium
Performance 110.0 4 Medium
Working from home (WFH) 101.0 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - report 111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - management -22.9 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 100.0 4 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 9.9 10 High
Service outsourcing 6.5 1 Low
Efficiency indicator - reporting 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 10.0 3 Medium
Average completion time for public works 0.8 4 High
Compliance with public works supervision 3.0 1 Low

P+ - Weak
41/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 1,887.7 1 Low
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 20.9 1 Low
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 7.6 1 Low
Average age 51.1 10 High
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 29.3 1 Low
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 17.2 4 Medium
Average of training days 0.5 5 Medium
Total managers on total personnel 4.2 5 Medium
Women managers on total managers 37.0 1 Low
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 91.0 8 High
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 154.3 4 Medium

PP - Satisfactory
54/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 29.8 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 470.0 8 High
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 97.0 8 High
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 105.5 8 High
Hospital migration 15.4 1 Low
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 109.8 6 High
Integrated Home Care services 0.4 1 Low
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.3 4 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 8.5 6 High
Essential levels of care - prevention area 45.3 1 Low
Essential levels of care - territorial area 49.3 1 Low
Essential levels of care - hospital area 52.6 1 Low
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 100.0 8 High

P+ - Weak
45/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 90.4 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 27.7 4 Medium
Timeliness of payments indicator -3.0 20 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 68.7 2 Low
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 38.1 2 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 78.1 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 58.9 8 Medium

PP+ - Good
69/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 75.0 6 Medium
Land consumption 2.2 12 High
Contaminated sites 0.7 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill 38.2 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 2.2 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 255.1 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk 12.1 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 9.1 5 Medium
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 320.8 12 High