• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP - Satisfactory
55/100
N.a.

Macro-indicators list

PP+ - Good
72/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 88.9 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 5,871.9 1 Low
Collection capacity 92.1 8 High
Spending capacity 88.8 8 High
Spending rigidity 3.2 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure on total expenses 18.9 8 High
Per capita debt from financing 459.8 3 Medium
Per capita debt to suppliers 120.0 3 Medium
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.0 8 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 135.8 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -93.8 1 Low
Expenditure for accredited private facilities on expenditure for health services 32.2 8 High
EU funds management - effected payments 113.0 8 High

P+ - Weak
47/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Integrated Activity and Organisation Plan (PIAO) - Public Value 60.0 1 Low
PIAO - Performance 100.0 3 Medium
Efficiency indicator - activities and delivery times (M2) 0.0 1 Low
Digitalization expenditure incidence 0.7 8 High
Investment expenditure on digitalization per 1,000 inhabitants 13,028.7 8 High
Service outsourcing 4.4 5 Medium
Subsidiary companies 100.0 10 High
Public real estate properties - report 52.0 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management -0.6 4 Medium
Average completion time for public works 1.5 1 Low
Compliance with public works supervision 15.0 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 57.3 1 Low

P - Poor
33/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 180.4 2 Medium
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 2.9 3 Medium
Personnel in flexible employment out of total employees 9.5 1 Low
Average age 52.2 5 Medium
Graduated (from university) employees (category D) 71.7 1 Low
Agile working employees out of total permanent employees 0.0 1 Low
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 24.8 1 Low
Average of training days 0.2 1 Low
EQ (High qualification) /EP (High professionality) profiles in service out of total officials and EQ area 11.1 4 High
Total managers on total personnel 2.3 4 High
Women managers on total managers 36.7 1 Low
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 87.4 8 High
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 4.2 1 Low

PP+ - Good
66/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Hospital migration 7.4 8 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 1.8 8 High
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 10.5 4 Medium
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 0.0 1 Low
Essential levels of care - global indicator 219.8 4 Medium
Landline high-speed internet access covering 57.1 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on health protection 2,531.7 3 Medium
Per capita investment in health protection 183.9 6 High
Per capita investments in transport and the right to mobility 80.2 4 Medium
Per capita investment in economic development and competitiveness 327.8 8 High
Per capita investment in land planning and housing construction 130.3 8 High
Per capita current expenditure on social rights, social policies and family 274.5 4 Medium
Per capita current expenditure on education and right to study per school-age population 289.1 4 Medium

PP+ - Good
62/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 71.2 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 19.3 6 Medium
TPI (Timeliness of Payment Indicator) - Ordinary component -18.2 16 High
TPI (Timeliness of Payment Indicator) - Healthcare component -24.2 10 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 4.3 5 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 1.1 5 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 77.8 4 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 70.0 10 High
Percentage of framework agreement contracts on total contracts – amount 89.9 1 Low
Incidence of direct awards to affiliated companies on total contracts - amount 0.0 4 High

P+ - Weak
46/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita expenditure on environmental protection, enhancement and restoration 25.0 4 Medium
Per capita investment in the unified regional policy for sustainable development and the protection of land and environment 0.0 1 Low
Per capita current expenditure on protected areas, nature parks, nature conservation and afforestation 4.4 3 Medium
Air quality - PM 2.5 93.3 1 Low
Per capita investment in air quality and pollution reduction 2.7 4 Medium
Per capita investment in integrated urban water management 16.3 4 Medium
Urban waste disposal at landfill 5.0 8 High
Per capita investment in waste management 0.0 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 22.4 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk 0.4 8 High
Population exposed to flood risk 9.9 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on soil defense 11.3 3 Medium
Per capita investment in soil defense 8.7 4 Medium