• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
62/100
N.a.

Macro-indicators list

PP - Satisfactory
56/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 93.0 8 High
Financial pressure per capita 9,133.4 1 Low
Collection capacity 95.5 8 High
Spending capacity 80.0 4 Medium
Spending rigidity 15.3 1 Low
Capital account expenditure on total expenses 21.7 8 High
Per capita debt from financing 138.5 6 High
Per capita debt to suppliers 409.1 1 Low
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.1 1 Low
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 133.2 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -515.5 1 Low
Expenditure for accredited private facilities on expenditure for health services 31.5 8 High
EU funds management - effected payments 70.0 1 Low

PP+ - Good
72/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Integrated Activity and Organisation Plan (PIAO) - Public Value 100.0 8 High
PIAO - Performance 100.0 6 High
Efficiency indicator - activities and delivery times (M2) 100.0 10 High
Digitalization expenditure incidence 0.8 8 High
Investment expenditure on digitalization per 1,000 inhabitants 27,857.1 8 High
Service outsourcing 3.6 5 Medium
Subsidiary companies 100.0 10 High
Public real estate properties - report 52.0 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management -25.0 1 Low
Average completion time for public works 1.5 1 Low
Compliance with public works supervision 30.0 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 87.3 10 High

P - Poor
38/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 1,485.2 1 Low
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 28.8 1 Low
Personnel in flexible employment out of total employees 10.2 1 Low
Average age 49.5 10 High
Graduated (from university) employees (category D) 87.8 10 High
Agile working employees out of total permanent employees 15.6 1 Low
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 22.2 1 Low
Average of training days 0.8 6 Medium
EQ (High qualification) /EP (High professionality) profiles in service out of total officials and EQ area 2 Medium
Total managers on total personnel 0.6 4 High
Women managers on total managers 36.1 1 Low
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 0 N.A.
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

PP+ - Good
75/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Hospital migration 13.8 4 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 3.1 1 Low
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 10.4 4 Medium
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 0.0 1 Low
Essential levels of care - global indicator 269.1 8 High
Landline high-speed internet access covering 77.6 8 High
Per capita expenditure on health protection 2,629.1 6 High
Per capita investment in health protection 101.4 3 Medium
Per capita investments in transport and the right to mobility 246.6 8 High
Per capita investment in economic development and competitiveness 530.4 8 High
Per capita investment in land planning and housing construction 74.7 8 High
Per capita current expenditure on social rights, social policies and family 568.7 8 High
Per capita current expenditure on education and right to study per school-age population 10,789.7 8 High

PP+ - Good
61/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 54.7 8 High
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 24.4 1 Low
TPI (Timeliness of Payment Indicator) - Ordinary component -14.3 16 High
TPI (Timeliness of Payment Indicator) - Healthcare component -1.4 5 Medium
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 12.5 5 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 8.5 1 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 74.4 4 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 53.2 5 Medium
Percentage of framework agreement contracts on total contracts – amount 8.8 12 High
Incidence of direct awards to affiliated companies on total contracts - amount 0.0 4 High

PP - Satisfactory
56/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita expenditure on environmental protection, enhancement and restoration 64.9 8 High
Per capita investment in the unified regional policy for sustainable development and the protection of land and environment 0.0 1 Low
Per capita current expenditure on protected areas, nature parks, nature conservation and afforestation 14.2 3 Medium
Air quality - PM 2.5 100.0 1 Low
Per capita investment in air quality and pollution reduction 0.0 1 Low
Per capita investment in integrated urban water management 51.7 8 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill 9.3 8 High
Per capita investment in waste management 15.8 8 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 62.0 4 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 2.0 4 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk 25.9 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on soil defense 0.0 1 Low
Per capita investment in soil defense 49.9 8 High