• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
62/100
N.a.

Macro-indicators list

PP+ - Good
63/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 91.3 8 High
Financial pressure per capita 5,952.0 1 Low
Collection capacity 85.3 4 Medium
Spending capacity 82.8 4 Medium
Spending rigidity 3.4 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure on total expenses 14.2 8 High
Per capita debt from financing 955.7 3 Medium
Per capita debt to suppliers 4.0 6 High
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.0 8 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 122.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -133.6 1 Low
Expenditure for accredited private facilities on expenditure for health services 40.3 4 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 84.0 4 Medium

PP+ - Good
64/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Integrated Activity and Organisation Plan (PIAO) - Public Value 100.0 8 High
PIAO - Performance 90.0 6 High
Efficiency indicator - activities and delivery times (M2) 100.0 10 High
Digitalization expenditure incidence 0.5 4 Medium
Investment expenditure on digitalization per 1,000 inhabitants 13,464.2 8 High
Service outsourcing 4.0 5 Medium
Subsidiary companies 35.0 1 Low
Public real estate properties - report 28.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - management -1.1 1 Low
Average completion time for public works 0.5 6 High
Compliance with public works supervision 54.0 4 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 87.3 10 High

P+ - Weak
49/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 179.5 2 Medium
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 2.3 3 Medium
Personnel in flexible employment out of total employees 2.0 5 Medium
Average age 54.4 1 Low
Graduated (from university) employees (category D) 95.6 10 High
Agile working employees out of total permanent employees 51.4 5 Medium
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 13.4 10 High
Average of training days 0.4 1 Low
EQ (High qualification) /EP (High professionality) profiles in service out of total officials and EQ area 0 N.A.
Total managers on total personnel 2.8 4 High
Women managers on total managers 43.1 3 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 96.7 4 Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0.0 1 Low

PP - Satisfactory
52/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Hospital migration 6.7 8 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.0 8 High
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 12.4 1 Low
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 0.0 1 Low
Essential levels of care - global indicator 166.1 1 Low
Landline high-speed internet access covering 39.2 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on health protection 2,495.8 3 Medium
Per capita investment in health protection 74.3 1 Low
Per capita investments in transport and the right to mobility 274.9 8 High
Per capita investment in economic development and competitiveness 98.3 4 Medium
Per capita investment in land planning and housing construction 72.6 8 High
Per capita current expenditure on social rights, social policies and family 279.9 4 Medium
Per capita current expenditure on education and right to study per school-age population 855.6 4 Medium

PP+ - Good
73/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 55.0 8 High
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 5.0 12 High
TPI (Timeliness of Payment Indicator) - Ordinary component -30.2 16 High
TPI (Timeliness of Payment Indicator) - Healthcare component -13.9 10 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 0.2 10 High
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.1 10 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 58.0 1 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 41.0 1 Low
Percentage of framework agreement contracts on total contracts – amount 90.1 1 Low
Incidence of direct awards to affiliated companies on total contracts - amount 0.0 4 High

PPP - Very Good
81/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita expenditure on environmental protection, enhancement and restoration 196.1 8 High
Per capita investment in the unified regional policy for sustainable development and the protection of land and environment 4.0 4 Medium
Per capita current expenditure on protected areas, nature parks, nature conservation and afforestation 63.9 6 High
Air quality - PM 2.5 12.5 8 High
Per capita investment in air quality and pollution reduction 8.4 8 High
Per capita investment in integrated urban water management 106.1 8 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill 25.0 4 Medium
Per capita investment in waste management 18.9 8 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 39.1 4 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.3 8 High
Population exposed to flood risk 7.5 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on soil defense 12.4 3 Medium
Per capita investment in soil defense 48.5 8 High