• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P - Poor
34/100
N.a.

Macro-indicators list

F - Fallible
18/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 0 N.A.
Financial pressure per capita 0 N.A.
Collection capacity 0 N.A.
Spending capacity 0 N.A.
Spending rigidity 0 N.A.
Capital account expenditure on total expenses 0 N.A.
Per capita debt from financing 0 N.A.
Per capita debt to suppliers 0 N.A.
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.0 8 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 0 N.A.
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita 0.2 8 High
Expenditure for accredited private facilities on expenditure for health services 49.5 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 76.0 1 Low

P - Poor
38/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Integrated Activity and Organisation Plan (PIAO) - Public Value 100.0 8 High
PIAO - Performance 85.0 3 Medium
Efficiency indicator - activities and delivery times (M2) 0.0 1 Low
Digitalization expenditure incidence 0.1 1 Low
Investment expenditure on digitalization per 1,000 inhabitants 0 N.A.
Service outsourcing 3.7 5 Medium
Subsidiary companies 17.0 1 Low
Public real estate properties - report 52.0 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management -9.5 1 Low
Average completion time for public works 1.1 3 Medium
Compliance with public works supervision 25.0 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 93.6 10 High

P+ - Weak
43/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 0 N.A.
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 2.4 3 Medium
Personnel in flexible employment out of total employees 0.3 10 High
Average age 58.3 1 Low
Graduated (from university) employees (category D) 44.4 1 Low
Agile working employees out of total permanent employees 10.5 1 Low
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 23.5 1 Low
Average of training days 1.0 6 Medium
EQ (High qualification) /EP (High professionality) profiles in service out of total officials and EQ area 4.3 4 High
Total managers on total personnel 6.4 1 Low
Women managers on total managers 31.8 1 Low
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 0.0 8 High
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 230.5 6 High

P - Poor
25/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Hospital migration 7.0 8 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.8 4 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 11.2 4 Medium
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 77.8 4 Medium
Essential levels of care - global indicator 183.6 1 Low
Landline high-speed internet access covering 63.1 4 Medium
Per capita expenditure on health protection 0 N.A.
Per capita investment in health protection 0 N.A.
Per capita investments in transport and the right to mobility 0 N.A.
Per capita investment in economic development and competitiveness 0 N.A.
Per capita investment in land planning and housing construction 0 N.A.
Per capita current expenditure on social rights, social policies and family 0 N.A.
Per capita current expenditure on education and right to study per school-age population 0 N.A.

PP - Satisfactory
52/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 59.7 4 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 3.7 12 High
TPI (Timeliness of Payment Indicator) - Ordinary component 0.0 8 Medium
TPI (Timeliness of Payment Indicator) - Healthcare component -23.5 10 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 9.6 5 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 7.4 1 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 84.1 8 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 29.2 1 Low
Percentage of framework agreement contracts on total contracts – amount 77.1 1 Low
Incidence of direct awards to affiliated companies on total contracts - amount 0.1 2 Medium

P - Poor
21/100
N.a.
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita expenditure on environmental protection, enhancement and restoration 0 N.A.
Per capita investment in the unified regional policy for sustainable development and the protection of land and environment 0 N.A.
Per capita current expenditure on protected areas, nature parks, nature conservation and afforestation 0 N.A.
Air quality - PM 2.5 64.7 4 Medium
Per capita investment in air quality and pollution reduction 0 N.A.
Per capita investment in integrated urban water management 0 N.A.
Urban waste disposal at landfill 40.5 1 Low
Per capita investment in waste management 0 N.A.
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 28.6 4 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.8 4 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk 2.6 8 High
Per capita expenditure on soil defense 0 N.A.
Per capita investment in soil defense 0 N.A.