• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
64/100

Macro-indicators list

P+ - Weak
48/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 85.6 1 Low
Financial pressure per capita 2,344.6 4 Medium
Collection capacity 86.5 5 Medium
Spending capacity 87.6 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 4.4 5 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 97.0 8 High
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 77.0 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 1.4 4 Medium
Debt per capita 1,015.0 5 Medium
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -20.1 5 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 42.0 5 Medium

PP+ - Good
71/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Open data availability 823.0 8 High
E- Government 7.0 1 Low
Degree of digitalization 1.4 10 High
Performance 119.6 12 High
Working from home (WFH) 11.0 8 High
Public works incompleted 0.7 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 1,000.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - management -0.2 4 Medium
Subsidiary companies 100.0 10 High
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 12.6 5 Medium
Court of Auditors - update 1.0 4 Medium

PP - Satisfactory
58/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 44.2 10 High
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 1.7 10 High
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0.0 10 High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 5.3 1 Low
Average age 54.1 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 46.1 5 Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) 2.6 10 High
Managers on population 0.4 5 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 100.0 1 Low
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 27.9 1 Low

PP+ - Good
78/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 2.0 10 High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 2.0 10 High
Online services 0.0 5 Medium
Landline high-speed internet access covering 46.9 10 High
Hospital migration 13.5 4 Medium
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 113.2 8 High
Integrated Home Care services 3.2 4 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.5 4 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 113.9 8 High
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 4.5 6 High
Citizens involvement 1.3 1 Low
FOIA register: accepted requests 95.7 4 High
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 13.8 4 High

PPP - Very Good
84/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 26.1 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 42.4 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 0.6 16 High
Timeliness of payments indicator -13.1 16 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 0.3 16 High
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.4 10 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 84.9 10 High

F - Fallible
18/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 84.6 1 Low
Land consumption 7.2 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 5.3 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 36.9 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 7.2 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 5.8 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 17.5 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 8.5 1 Low