• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
64/100

Macro-indicators list

P+ - Weak
48/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 85.6 1 Basso
Financial pressure per capita 2,344.6 4 Medium
Collection capacity 86.5 5 Medium
Spending capacity 87.6 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 4.4 5 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 97.0 8 Alto
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities 77.0 1 Basso
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 1.4 4 Medium
Debt per capita 1,015.0 5 Medium
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -20.1 5 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 42.0 5 Medium

PP+ - Good
71/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Open data availability 823.0 8 Alto
E- Government 7.0 1 Basso
Degree of digitization 1.4 10 Alto
Target achievement 119.6 12 Alto
Smart Working 11.0 8 Alto
Public works incompleted 0.7 8 Alto
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 1,000.0 1 Basso
Public Real Estate properties - management -0.2 4 Medium
Subsidiary companies 100.0 10 Alto
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 12.6 5 Medium
Court of Auditors - update 1.0 4 Medium

PP - Satisfactory
58/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 44.2 10 Alto
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 1.7 10 Alto
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0.0 10 Alto
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 5.3 1 Basso
Average age 54.1 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 46.1 5 Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) 2.6 10 Alto
Managers on population 0.4 5 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 100.0 1 Basso
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 27.9 1 Basso

PP+ - Good
78/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 2.0 10 Alto
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 2.0 10 Alto
Online services 0.0 5 Medium
Landline high-speed internet access covering 46.9 10 Alto
Hospital emigration 13.5 4 Medium
Beds in nursing homes (BES) 113.2 8 Alto
Integrated home care services 3.2 4 Medium
Accredited private health care centers 2.5 4 Medium
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita 113.9 8 Alto
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 4.5 6 Alto
Citizens involvement 1.3 1 Basso
FOIA register: accepted requests 95.7 4 Alto
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 13.8 4 Alto

PPP - Very Good
84/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 26.1 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 42.4 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 0.6 16 Alto
Timeliness of payments indicator -13.1 16 Alto
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers 0.3 16 Alto
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens 0.4 10 Alto
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 84.9 10 Alto

F - Fallible
18/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 84.6 1 Basso
Land consumption 7.2 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 5.3 1 Basso
Urban waste disposal into dump 36.9 1 Basso
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 7.2 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 5.8 1 Basso
Population exposed to flood risk 17.5 1 Basso
Renewable energy 8.5 1 Basso