• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P - Poor
33/100

Macro-indicators list

P - Poor
39/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 80.4 1 Low
Financial pressure per capita 2,488.3 4 Medium
Collection capacity 74.7 1 Low
Spending capacity 77.6 1 Low
Spending rigidity 5.8 5 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 96.8 8 High
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 55.4 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.1 8 High
Debt per capita 1,436.3 5 Medium
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -97.2 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 34.0 1 Low

P - Poor
30/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Open data availability 0 N.A.
E- Government 16.8 10 High
Degree of digitalization 0.5 1 Low
Performance 0 N.A.
Working from home (WFH) 10.0 4 Medium
Public works incompleted 2.4 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 0.0 0 N.A.
Public Real Estate properties - management -1.9 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 60.0 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 10.2 1 Low
Court of Auditors - update 2.0 8 High

P - Poor
23/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 111.9 5 Medium
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 3.8 5 Medium
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0 N.A.
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 14.8 1 Low
Average age 58.8 1 Low
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 33.9 1 Low
Average days of absence (sick leave) 7.9 5 Medium
Managers on population 0.7 5 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 0 N.A.
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

P - Poor
24/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 0.0 1 Low
Online services 0 N.A.
Landline high-speed internet access covering 6.4 1 Low
Hospital migration 28.6 1 Low
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 69.5 4 Medium
Integrated Home Care services 5.1 8 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.5 4 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 130.2 4 Medium
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 0 N.A.
Citizens involvement 1.3 1 Low
FOIA register: accepted requests 0 N.A.
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 0 N.A.

P - Poor
24/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 20.0 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 70.5 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 38.0 2 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator 123.5 2 Low
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 372.9 2 Low
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 20.4 1 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 0.0 1 Low

PP+ - Good
76/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 33.3 12 High
Land consumption 3.9 12 High
Contaminated sites 0.3 12 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill 90.0 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 3.9 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk 6.5 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 1.4 12 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 89.2 14 High