• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP - Satisfactory
54/100

Macro-indicators list

P+ - Weak
43/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 90.5 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 9,317.0 1 Low
Collection capacity 91.7 10 High
Spending capacity 86.7 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 19.1 1 Low
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 80.8 1 Low
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 66.6 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 3.7 4 Medium
Debt per capita 344.7 10 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -617.7 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 45.0 5 Medium

PP+ - Good
61/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Open data availability 300.0 1 Low
E- Government 22.8 10 High
Degree of digitalization 1.3 10 High
Performance 0.0 1 Low
Working from home (WFH) 10.0 4 Medium
Public works incompleted 0.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 1,111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - management -5.7 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 60.0 5 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 11.4 5 Medium
Court of Auditors - update 2.0 8 High

P - Poor
39/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 1,941.9 1 Low
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 23.4 1 Low
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0.0 10 High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 21.4 1 Low
Average age 48.4 10 High
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 43.2 5 Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) 2.8 10 High
Managers on population 7.5 1 Low
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 0 N.A.
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

PP - Satisfactory
59/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 2.0 10 High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 2.0 5 Medium
Online services 19.5 5 Medium
Landline high-speed internet access covering 20.0 5 Medium
Hospital migration 4.9 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 111.7 8 High
Integrated Home Care services 0.2 1 Low
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.5 4 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 90.1 8 High
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 1.0 1 Low
Citizens involvement 1.3 1 Low
FOIA register: accepted requests 78.3 1 Medium
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 22.6 2 Medium

P - Poor
38/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 43.4 2 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 81.1 2 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 24.4 8 Medium
Timeliness of payments indicator -10.0 16 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 9.4 0 N.A.
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 2.7 0 N.A.
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 85.7 10 High

PPP+ - Excellent
94/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 83.3 6 Medium
Land consumption 2.7 12 High
Contaminated sites 0.2 12 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill 1.3 14 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 2.8 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.6 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk 2.0 12 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 180.7 14 High