• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
64/100

Macro-indicators list

PP - Satisfactory
55/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 92.0 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 2,403.5 4 Medium
Collection capacity 86.6 5 Medium
Spending capacity 86.2 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 2.8 10 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 95.0 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 38.8 8 High
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 6.3 4 Medium
Debt per capita 1,239.0 5 Medium
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -12.6 5 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 35.0 1 Low

PPP - Very Good
82/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Open data availability 1,172.6 8 High
E- Government 20.4 10 High
Degree of digitalization 1.0 10 High
Performance 0.0 1 Low
Working from home (WFH) 11.0 8 High
Public works incompleted 1.7 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 1,111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - management -1.6 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 94.4 10 High
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 15.6 10 High
Court of Auditors - update 2.0 8 High

PP+ - Good
66/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 45.0 10 High
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 1.8 10 High
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0 N.A.
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 0.0 10 High
Average age 54.4 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 46.2 5 Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) 5.6 10 High
Managers on population 0.2 10 High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 98.7 5 Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 28.4 1 Low

PP+ - Good
71/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 2.0 10 High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 2.0 10 High
Online services 19.5 10 High
Landline high-speed internet access covering 34.7 10 High
Hospital migration 6.7 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 115.5 8 High
Integrated Home Care services 2.7 4 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 3.3 1 Low
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 121.8 4 Medium
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 0 N.A.
Citizens involvement 6.5 6 High
FOIA register: accepted requests 0 N.A.
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 0 N.A.

P+ - Weak
40/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 20.8 2 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 80.0 2 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 64.9 2 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator 7.7 8 Medium
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 1.0 16 High
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.5 5 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 92.6 5 Medium

PP - Satisfactory
53/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 88.6 1 Low
Land consumption 6.7 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 42.6 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 12.0 14 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 6.7 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.6 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk 4.8 6 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 41.8 7 Medium