• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P - Poor
39/100

Macro-indicators list

PP - Satisfactory
51/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 96.3 8 High
Financial pressure per capita 4,482.3 1 Low
Collection capacity 95.8 10 High
Spending capacity 89.0 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 4.3 5 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 92.2 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 73.6 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 10.5 1 Low
Debt per capita 917.5 10 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -153.1 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 44.0 5 Medium

P - Poor
30/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Open data availability 62.0 1 Low
E- Government 2.4 1 Low
Degree of digitalization 1.0 5 Medium
Performance 0 N.A.
Working from home (WFH) 0 N.A.
Public works incompleted 12.9 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 1,010.0 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management -1.0 4 Medium
Subsidiary companies 56.3 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 12.6 5 Medium
Court of Auditors - update 2.0 8 High

P+ - Weak
46/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 151.2 5 Medium
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 3.6 5 Medium
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0.3 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 0.0 10 High
Average age 54.0 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 37.6 1 Low
Average days of absence (sick leave) 9.1 5 Medium
Managers on population 0.7 5 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 98.0 5 Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

P - Poor
35/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 0 N.A.
Online services 19.0 1 Low
Landline high-speed internet access covering 14.6 1 Low
Hospital migration 6.4 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 51.8 4 Medium
Integrated Home Care services 1.2 1 Low
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 1.9 8 High
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 141.1 1 Low
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 3.0 6 High
Citizens involvement 2.6 3 Medium
FOIA register: accepted requests 86.7 2 Medium
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 0 N.A.

P - Poor
21/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 0 N.A.
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 0 N.A.
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 0 N.A.
Timeliness of payments indicator -11.4 16 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 0 N.A.
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0 N.A.
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 75.0 5 Medium

PP+ - Good
64/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 37.5 12 High
Land consumption 3.3 12 High
Contaminated sites 12.4 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 22.4 7 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 3.3 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.4 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk 7.1 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 34.2 7 Medium