• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
71/100

Macro-indicators list

PPP+ - Excellent
91/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 92.8 8 High
Financial pressure per capita 2,322.3 4 Medium
Collection capacity 88.9 5 Medium
Spending capacity 93.1 10 High
Spending rigidity 2.2 10 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 96.4 8 High
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 47.8 8 High
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Debt per capita 839.1 10 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita 20.8 10 High
EU funds management - effected payments 55.0 10 High

PP+ - Good
71/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Open data availability 750.0 4 Medium
E- Government 16.0 10 High
Degree of digitalization 0.6 5 Medium
Performance 110.5 12 High
Working from home (WFH) 11.0 8 High
Public works incompleted 1.7 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 1,010.0 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management -2.5 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 53.3 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 14.4 10 High
Court of Auditors - update 2.0 8 High

PP+ - Good
66/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 39.3 10 High
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 1.6 10 High
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0.3 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 3.6 5 Medium
Average age 53.4 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 57.0 10 High
Average days of absence (sick leave) 7.5 5 Medium
Managers on population 0.2 10 High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 100.0 1 Low
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 86.0 5 Medium

PPP - Very Good
88/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 2.0 10 High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 2.0 10 High
Online services 71.5 10 High
Landline high-speed internet access covering 30.2 10 High
Hospital migration 5.7 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 104.4 8 High
Integrated Home Care services 3.5 8 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 3.4 1 Low
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 106.4 8 High
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 3.0 6 High
Citizens involvement 12.0 6 High
FOIA register: accepted requests 94.0 2 Medium
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 28.5 1 Medium

PP - Satisfactory
58/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 47.1 2 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 83.6 2 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 40.2 2 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator -17.9 16 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 0.0 16 High
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.0 10 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 82.6 10 High

P - Poor
31/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 89.4 1 Low
Land consumption 8.9 1 Low
Contaminated sites 1.6 6 Medium
Urban waste disposal at landfill 9.4 14 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 8.9 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk 2.2 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk 63.7 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 19.7 1 Low