• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
69/100

Macro-indicators list

PP+ - Good
61/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 94.6 8 Alto
Financial pressure per capita 5,201.3 1 Basso
Collection capacity 96.1 10 Alto
Spending capacity 95.4 10 Alto
Spending rigidity 4.6 5 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 86.2 1 Basso
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities 69.0 1 Basso
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 6.9 4 Medium
Debt per capita 282.5 10 Alto
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -89.0 1 Basso
EU funds management - effected payments 63.0 10 Alto

PPP - Very Good
82/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Open data availability 954.2 8 Alto
E- Government 12.0 5 Medium
Degree of digitization 2.3 10 Alto
Target achievement 129.5 12 Alto
Smart Working 10.0 4 Medium
Public works incompleted 0.5 8 Alto
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 1,111.0 8 Alto
Public Real Estate properties - management -0.2 4 Medium
Subsidiary companies 61.5 5 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 14.4 10 Alto
Court of Auditors - update 2.0 8 Alto

PP - Satisfactory
52/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 163.1 5 Medium
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 3.5 5 Medium
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0.7 1 Basso
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 3.1 5 Medium
Average age 53.1 10 Alto
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 45.2 5 Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) 8.5 5 Medium
Managers on population 0.6 5 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 88.1 10 Alto
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 8.5 1 Basso

PP+ - Good
77/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 2.0 10 Alto
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 2.0 10 Alto
Online services 19.5 5 Medium
Landline high-speed internet access covering 23.5 5 Medium
Hospital emigration 7.0 8 Alto
Beds in nursing homes (BES) 116.8 8 Alto
Integrated home care services 3.1 4 Medium
Accredited private health care centers 1.8 8 Alto
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita 125.7 4 Medium
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 1.5 3 Medium
Citizens involvement 4.5 6 Alto
FOIA register: accepted requests 94.6 2 Medium
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 17.2 4 Alto

PP+ - Good
74/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 25.4 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 41.2 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 3.1 16 Alto
Timeliness of payments indicator -20.2 16 Alto
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers 1.1 16 Alto
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens 0.6 5 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 79.1 5 Medium

P+ - Weak
48/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 89.3 1 Basso
Land consumption 8.0 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 19.2 1 Basso
Urban waste disposal into dump 7.8 14 Alto
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 8.0 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 0.4 12 Alto
Population exposed to flood risk 7.3 1 Basso
Renewable energy 29.4 7 Medium