• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
69/100

Macro-indicators list

PP+ - Good
61/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 94.6 8 High
Financial pressure per capita 5,201.3 1 Low
Collection capacity 96.1 10 High
Spending capacity 95.4 10 High
Spending rigidity 4.6 5 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 86.2 1 Low
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 69.0 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 6.9 4 Medium
Debt per capita 282.5 10 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -89.0 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 63.0 10 High

PPP - Very Good
82/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Open data availability 954.2 8 High
E- Government 12.0 5 Medium
Degree of digitalization 2.3 10 High
Performance 129.5 12 High
Working from home (WFH) 10.0 4 Medium
Public works incompleted 0.5 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 1,111.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - management -0.2 4 Medium
Subsidiary companies 61.5 5 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 14.4 10 High
Court of Auditors - update 2.0 8 High

PP - Satisfactory
52/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 163.1 5 Medium
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 3.5 5 Medium
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0.7 1 Low
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 3.1 5 Medium
Average age 53.1 10 High
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 45.2 5 Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) 8.5 5 Medium
Managers on population 0.6 5 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 88.1 10 High
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 8.5 1 Low

PP+ - Good
77/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 2.0 10 High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 2.0 10 High
Online services 19.5 5 Medium
Landline high-speed internet access covering 23.5 5 Medium
Hospital migration 7.0 8 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 116.8 8 High
Integrated Home Care services 3.1 4 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 1.8 8 High
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 125.7 4 Medium
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 1.5 3 Medium
Citizens involvement 4.5 6 High
FOIA register: accepted requests 94.6 2 Medium
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 17.2 4 High

PP+ - Good
74/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 25.4 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 41.2 8 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 3.1 16 High
Timeliness of payments indicator -20.2 16 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 1.1 16 High
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.6 5 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 79.1 5 Medium

P+ - Weak
48/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 89.3 1 Low
Land consumption 8.0 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 19.2 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 7.8 14 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 8.0 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 0.4 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk 7.3 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 29.4 7 Medium