• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P+ - Weak
42/100

Macro-indicators list

P+ - Weak
43/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 84.2 1 Low
Financial pressure per capita 2,303.6 8 High
Collection capacity 77.7 1 Low
Spending capacity 79.0 1 Low
Spending rigidity 4.0 5 Medium
Debt per capita 1,491.1 1 Low
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 103.9 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities 55.2 8 High
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -10.3 5 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 28.0 1 Low

PP - Satisfactory
50/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 23.4 12 High
Degree of digitization 0.2 1 Low
Target achievement 101.0 1 Low
Smart Working 10.0 5 Medium
Public works incompleted 0.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report 111.0 10 High
Public Real Estate properties - management -2.0 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 66.7 6 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 15.6 6 Medium

P - Poor
34/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 51.9 5 Medium
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 1.1 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 1.1 5 Medium
Average age 55.0 1 Low
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 47.9 4 Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) 17.7 4 Medium
Total managers on total personnel 4.0 5 Medium
Women managers on total managers 38.6 4 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 0 N.A.
Average of training days 0.0 1 Low
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

P+ - Weak
49/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) 11.0 5 Medium
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) 0.0 1 Low
Landline high-speed internet access covering 16.4 5 Medium
Hospital emigration 14.5 1 Low
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 42.0 1 Low
Integrated home care services 4.3 10 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 1.0 10 High
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita 15.0 1 Low
Citizens involvement 7.8 5 Medium
FOIA register: accepted requests 94.6 10 High

F - Fallible
18/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 13.7 14 High
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 83.1 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 36.7 1 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator 62.0 2 Low
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers 0 N.A.
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens 0 N.A.
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 0 N.A.

PP - Satisfactory
51/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 81.8 6 Medium
Land consumption 5.0 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 0.6 12 High
Urban waste disposal into dump 29.2 7 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 5.0 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 5.6 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 7.2 6 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 42.4 7 Medium