• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
70/100

Macro-indicators list

PP+ - Good
79/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 89.2 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 2,387.3 4 Medium
Collection capacity 84.2 5 Medium
Spending capacity 90.7 10 High
Spending rigidity 1.8 10 High
Debt per capita 287.8 10 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 103.1 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities 62.1 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita 21.0 10 High
EU funds management - effected payments 55.0 10 High

PP+ - Good
78/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 22.8 12 High
Degree of digitization 0.3 6 Medium
Target achievement 111.0 12 High
Smart Working 11.0 10 High
Public works incompleted 0.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report 101.0 5 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management -2.4 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 86.7 12 High
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 16.8 12 High

PP+ - Good
74/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 38.7 10 High
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 0.8 10 High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 3.3 5 Medium
Average age 53.1 4 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 60.0 8 High
Average days of absence (sick leave) 14.0 8 High
Total managers on total personnel 3.3 5 Medium
Women managers on total managers 46.8 8 High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 100.0 1 Low
Average of training days 3.2 10 High
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 83.3 5 Medium

PPP - Very Good
86/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) 111.0 10 High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) 111.0 10 High
Landline high-speed internet access covering 30.2 10 High
Hospital emigration 4.8 10 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 104.4 10 High
Integrated home care services 3.6 10 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 3.4 1 Low
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita 10.6 10 High
Citizens involvement 15.0 10 High
FOIA register: accepted requests 90.3 5 Medium

P+ - Weak
47/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 38.4 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 72.2 7 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 43.2 1 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator -15.3 16 High
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers 2.7 7 Medium
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens 0.2 14 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 74.2 1 Low

P - Poor
31/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 89.4 1 Low
Land consumption 8.9 1 Low
Contaminated sites 1.7 6 Medium
Urban waste disposal into dump 9.2 14 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 8.9 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk 2.0 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk 62.5 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 22.1 1 Low