• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
63/100

Macro-indicators list

P+ - Weak
48/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 83.8 1 Low
Financial pressure per capita 2,416.8 4 Medium
Collection capacity 84.3 5 Medium
Spending capacity 89.2 10 High
Spending rigidity 6.6 5 Medium
Debt per capita 522.2 10 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 101.1 1 Low
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 79.2 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 67.3 1 Low
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -20.4 5 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 42.0 5 Medium

PP+ - Good
74/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 11.4 1 Low
Degree of digitalization 0.5 12 High
Performance 111.0 12 High
Working from home (WFH) 11.0 10 High
Public works incompleted 0.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report 1.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - management -0.3 6 Medium
Subsidiary companies 100.0 12 High
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 20.4 12 High

PP - Satisfactory
51/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 46.3 5 Medium
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 1.0 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 4.1 5 Medium
Average age 53.1 4 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 48.1 4 Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) 13.8 8 High
Total managers on total personnel 4.6 1 Low
Women managers on total managers 51.4 8 High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 0 N.A.
Average of training days 2.0 10 High
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 38.4 1 Low

PP+ - Good
71/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) 111.0 10 High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) 111.0 10 High
Landline high-speed internet access covering 46.9 10 High
Hospital migration 11.9 5 Medium
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 113.2 10 High
Integrated Home Care services 2.8 5 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.6 5 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 12.0 5 Medium
Citizens involvement 2.6 1 Low
FOIA register: accepted requests 95.8 10 High

PPP - Very Good
86/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 27.8 7 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 34.2 14 High
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 18.0 7 Medium
Timeliness of payments indicator -12.7 16 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 0.3 14 High
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.3 14 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 82.7 14 High

P - Poor
29/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 67.9 12 High
Land consumption 7.3 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 5.1 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 36.2 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 7.2 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 5.9 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 17.4 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 8.3 1 Low