• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P - Poor
32/100

Macro-indicators list

P - Poor
35/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 75.0 1 Low
Financial pressure per capita 2,481.3 4 Medium
Collection capacity 82.9 1 Low
Spending capacity 83.2 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 6.0 5 Medium
Debt per capita 1,546.6 1 Low
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 102.0 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities 44.2 8 High
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.7 4 Medium
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -100.1 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 34.0 1 Low

P - Poor
24/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 1.2 1 Low
Degree of digitization 0.4 12 High
Target achievement 0 N.A.
Smart Working 0.0 1 Low
Public works incompleted 0.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report 0 N.A.
Public Real Estate properties - management -1.2 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 0 N.A.
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 11.0 1 Low

P - Poor
28/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 130.5 1 Low
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 1.6 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 16.1 1 Low
Average age 57.9 1 Low
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 36.0 1 Low
Average days of absence (sick leave) 13.0 8 High
Total managers on total personnel 5.9 1 Low
Women managers on total managers 48.2 8 High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 100.0 1 Low
Average of training days 0.2 1 Low
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0 N.A.

P - Poor
23/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) 0 N.A.
Landline high-speed internet access covering 6.4 1 Low
Hospital emigration 27.3 1 Low
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 69.5 5 Medium
Integrated home care services 3.2 5 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.6 5 Medium
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita 13.5 5 Medium
Citizens involvement 2.6 1 Low
FOIA register: accepted requests 0 N.A.

P - Poor
32/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 16.7 7 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 66.2 7 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 36.2 1 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator -2.8 16 High
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers 0 N.A.
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens 0 N.A.
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 0.0 1 Low

PP+ - Good
76/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 33.3 12 High
Land consumption 3.9 12 High
Contaminated sites 0.3 12 High
Urban waste disposal into dump 79.3 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 3.9 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk 6.1 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 2.3 12 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 83.0 14 High