• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
60/100

Macro-indicators list

PP - Satisfactory
57/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 86.7 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 8,965.3 1 Low
Collection capacity 92.6 10 High
Spending capacity 85.1 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 19.0 1 Low
Debt per capita 297.3 10 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 123.1 8 High
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities 65.4 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -617.7 1 Low
EU funds management - effected payments 45.0 5 Medium

PP+ - Good
64/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 31.5 12 High
Degree of digitization 1.4 12 High
Target achievement 10.0 6 Medium
Smart Working 11.0 10 High
Public works incompleted 0 N.A.
Public Real Estate properties - report 11.0 5 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management -8.1 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 76.2 6 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 25.8 12 High

P+ - Weak
47/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 1,917.9 1 Low
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 34.3 1 Low
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 17.3 1 Low
Average age 48.5 8 High
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 43.9 4 Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) 17.7 4 Medium
Total managers on total personnel 2.5 10 High
Women managers on total managers 43.6 8 High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 99.0 4 Medium
Average of training days 0.2 1 Low
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 145.1 5 Medium

PP+ - Good
62/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) 111.0 10 High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) 11.0 5 Medium
Landline high-speed internet access covering 20.0 5 Medium
Hospital emigration 4.4 10 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 111.7 10 High
Integrated home care services 0.5 1 Low
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.7 1 Low
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita 9.4 10 High
Citizens involvement 6.5 5 Medium
FOIA register: accepted requests 86.1 5 Medium

PP - Satisfactory
54/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 43.2 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 81.5 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 22.9 7 Medium
Timeliness of payments indicator -5.3 16 High
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers 0.9 14 High
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens 5.9 1 Low
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 82.0 14 High

PP+ - Good
77/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 100.0 1 Low
Land consumption 2.7 12 High
Contaminated sites 0.3 12 High
Urban waste disposal into dump 2.2 14 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 2.7 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk 2.3 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk 9.8 6 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 241.1 14 High