• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

PP+ - Good
62/100

Macro-indicators list

PP - Satisfactory
54/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 88.7 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 2,410.6 4 Medium
Collection capacity 85.8 5 Medium
Spending capacity 84.6 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 2.5 10 High
Debt per capita 1,053.7 5 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 104.2 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 80.5 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 17.9 1 Low
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -18.8 5 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments 59.0 10 High

PP+ - Good
61/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 18.6 6 Medium
Degree of digitalization 0.3 6 Medium
Performance 111.0 12 High
Working from home (WFH) 11.0 10 High
Public works incompleted 0.0 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report 100.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - management -0.6 6 Medium
Subsidiary companies 78.6 6 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 15.6 6 Medium

PP+ - Good
63/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 44.7 5 Medium
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 0.9 10 High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 1.2 5 Medium
Average age 53.6 4 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 53.5 8 High
Average days of absence (sick leave) 13.1 8 High
Total managers on total personnel 3.2 5 Medium
Women managers on total managers 38.0 4 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 92.4 4 Medium
Average of training days 0.7 5 Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 138.6 5 Medium

PPP+ - Excellent
90/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) 111.0 10 High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) 111.0 10 High
Landline high-speed internet access covering 27.0 5 Medium
Hospital migration 5.5 10 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 61.3 5 Medium
Integrated Home Care services 3.6 10 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.1 10 High
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 11.4 10 High
Citizens involvement 16.5 10 High
FOIA register: accepted requests 97.3 10 High

PP - Satisfactory
54/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 30.9 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 79.5 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 2.9 14 High
Timeliness of payments indicator -27.0 16 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 1.3 7 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 0.3 14 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 70.3 1 Low

P - Poor
29/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 76.5 6 Medium
Land consumption 6.2 6 Medium
Contaminated sites 5.1 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 36.4 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 6.2 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 4.2 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 25.5 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 42.7 7 Medium