This data has been published here as a demo of our services: it refers to the Regions, analyzed in 2021.
To access the results for other years and/or other types of entities (Municipalities, Union of Municipalities), it is necessary to proceed to the web page dedicated to our services.
Find out how to subscribeRating classes
- PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
- PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
- PP+ - Good (60, 79)
- PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
- P+ - Weak (40, 49)
- P - Poor (20, 39)
- F - Fallible (1, 19)
Administrative Capacity Index
Territorial distribution of the rating
| Rating class | ND - Unavailable | F - Fallible | P - Poor | P+ - Weak | PP - Satisfactory | PP+ - Good | PPP - Very Good | PPP+ - Excellent | ND - Unavailable | F - Fallible | P - Poor | P+ - Weak | PP - Satisfactory | PP+ - Good | PPP - Very Good | PPP+ - Excellent | ND - Unavailable | F - Fallible | P - Poor | P+ - Weak | PP - Satisfactory | PP+ - Good | PPP - Very Good | PPP+ - Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Center | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| South | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class
| Rating class | Number of administrations |
|---|---|
| ND - Unavailable | 0 |
| F - Fallible | 0 |
| P - Poor | 2 |
| P+ - Weak | 7 |
| PP - Satisfactory | 6 |
| PP+ - Good | 6 |
| PPP - Very Good | 0 |
| PPP+ - Excellent | 0 |
Benchmark score
Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
Emilia-Romagna
70/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
52/100
Worst score
Molise
Molise
32/100
Public Administrations Ranking
| Public Administration | Score | Rating class |
|---|---|---|
| Emilia-Romagna | 70 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Piemonte | 68 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Lombardia | 65 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Liguria | 63 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Toscana | 62 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| P.A. Bolzano | 60 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Friuli-Venezia Giulia | 58 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| P.A. Trento | 56 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Veneto | 56 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Marche | 55 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Umbria | 54 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Puglia | 53 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Lazio | 47 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Valle d'Aosta | 47 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Sardegna | 45 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Campania | 43 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Abruzzo | 42 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Calabria | 42 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Sicilia | 41 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Basilicata | 37 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Molise | 32 | 2 | P - Poor |
Download
All data
Public Administration
Administrative Capacity Index: score
Chronological trend
Rating class
70/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 71 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 70 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
79/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 91 | excellent | PPP+ - Excellent |
| 2022 | 79 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
78/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 71 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 78 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
74/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 66 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 74 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
86/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 88 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
| 2022 | 86 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
PPP - Very Good
47/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 58 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 47 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
31/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 31 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 31 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
68/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 64 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 68 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
55/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 55 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 55 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
76/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 82 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
| 2022 | 76 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
64/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 66 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 64 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
81/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 71 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 81 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
PPP - Very Good
60/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 40 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 60 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
59/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 53 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 59 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
65/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 64 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 65 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
62/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 67 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 62 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
77/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 75 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 77 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
64/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 95 | excellent | PPP+ - Excellent |
| 2022 | 64 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
70/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 71 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 70 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
54/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 23 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 54 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
43/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 37 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 43 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
63/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 64 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 63 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
48/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 48 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 48 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
74/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 71 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 74 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
51/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 58 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 51 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
71/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 78 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 71 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
86/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 84 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
| 2022 | 86 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
PPP - Very Good
29/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 18 | fallible | F - Fallible |
| 2022 | 29 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
62/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 67 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 62 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
54/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 58 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 54 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
61/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 71 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 61 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
63/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 81 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
| 2022 | 63 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
90/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 82 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
| 2022 | 90 | excellent | PPP+ - Excellent |
PPP+ - Excellent
54/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 51 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 54 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
29/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 45 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 29 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
60/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 54 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 60 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
57/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 43 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 57 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
64/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 61 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 64 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
47/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 39 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 47 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
62/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 59 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 62 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
54/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 38 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 54 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
77/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 94 | excellent | PPP+ - Excellent |
| 2022 | 77 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
58/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 69 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 58 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
68/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 61 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 68 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
58/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 82 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
| 2022 | 58 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
35/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 52 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 35 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
62/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 77 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 62 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
72/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 74 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 72 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
48/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 48 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 48 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
56/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 54 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 56 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
59/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 52 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 59 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
62/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 78 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 62 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
44/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 24 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 44 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
58/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 56 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 58 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
40/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 27 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 40 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
70/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 81 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
| 2022 | 70 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
56/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 67 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 56 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
66/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 79 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 66 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
41/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 56 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 41 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
55/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 85 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
| 2022 | 55 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
71/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 65 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 71 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
66/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 78 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 66 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
37/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 37 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 37 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
55/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 55 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 55 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
63/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 74 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 63 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
55/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 64 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 55 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
60/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 71 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 60 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
34/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 37 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 34 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
72/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 34 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 72 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
50/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 44 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 50 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
54/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 45 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 54 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
67/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 61 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 67 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
53/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 41 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 53 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
40/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 52 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 40 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
38/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 44 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 38 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
86/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 29 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 86 | verygood | PPP - Very Good |
PPP - Very Good
44/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 50 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 44 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
53/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 51 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 53 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
48/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 66 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 48 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
63/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 48 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 63 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
56/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 62 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 56 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
35/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 36 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 35 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
59/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 58 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 59 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
54/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 42 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 54 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
47/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 50 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 47 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
38/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 47 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 38 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
46/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 48 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 46 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
42/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 57 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 42 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
34/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 37 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 34 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
79/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 66 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 79 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
52/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 52 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 52 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
47/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 49 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 47 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
59/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 47 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 59 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
41/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 56 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 41 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
51/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 48 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 51 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
45/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 39 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 45 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
34/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 44 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 34 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
59/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 65 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 59 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
45/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 39 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 45 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
48/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 51 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 48 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
46/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 30 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 46 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
40/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 46 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 40 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
40/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 35 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 40 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
33/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 21 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 33 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
69/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 64 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 69 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
43/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 53 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 43 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
45/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 65 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 45 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
61/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 61 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 61 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
61/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 52 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 61 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
23/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 42 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 23 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
26/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 53 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 26 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
32/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 42 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 32 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
42/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 39 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 42 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
43/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 47 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 43 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
50/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 31 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 50 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
34/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 46 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 34 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
49/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 41 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 49 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
18/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 17 | fallible | F - Fallible |
| 2022 | 18 | fallible | F - Fallible |
F - Fallible
51/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 70 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 51 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
42/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 44 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 42 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
36/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 41 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 36 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
54/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 33 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 54 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
34/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 41 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 34 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
23/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 46 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 23 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
45/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 49 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 45 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
64/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 69 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 64 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
41/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 45 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 41 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
15/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 54 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 15 | fallible | F - Fallible |
F - Fallible
46/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 38 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 46 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
30/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 35 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 30 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
48/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 59 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 48 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
53/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 30 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 53 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
56/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 56 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 56 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
PP - Satisfactory
37/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 45 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 37 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
20/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 20 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 20 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
28/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 56 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 28 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
41/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 43 | weak | P+ - Weak |
| 2022 | 41 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
30/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 50 | satisfactory | PP - Satisfactory |
| 2022 | 30 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
46/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 26 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 46 | weak | P+ - Weak |
P+ - Weak
76/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 76 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 76 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good
32/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 33 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 32 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
Administrative Capacity Index by macro-indicators
35/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 39 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 35 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
24/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 30 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 24 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
28/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 23 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 28 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
23/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 24 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 23 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
32/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 24 | poor | P - Poor |
| 2022 | 32 | poor | P - Poor |
P - Poor
76/100
| Year | Rating | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 76 | good | PP+ - Good |
| 2022 | 76 | good | PP+ - Good |
PP+ - Good