Financial situation
Spending rigidity
Territorial distribution of the evaluation of the indicator
| Evaluation of the indicator | N.A./N.C. | Low | Medium | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Center | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| South | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Distribution of Administrations with respect to the evaluation of the indicator
| Evaluation of the indicator | Number of administrations |
|---|---|
| High | 6 |
| Medium | 8 |
| Low | 4 |
| N.A./N.C. | 3 |
Benchmark score
Average score of the Public Administrations
58/100
12/100
They did not publish the data (and are therefore not evaluable): Basilicata, Molise, Sicilia
Abruzzo
8
(100/100)
High
Emilia-Romagna
8
(100/100)
High
Lombardia
8
(100/100)
High
Puglia
8
(100/100)
High
Toscana
8
(100/100)
High
Veneto
8
(100/100)
High
Calabria
4
(50/100)
Medium
Campania
4
(50/100)
Medium
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
4
(50/100)
Medium
Liguria
4
(50/100)
Medium
Marche
4
(50/100)
Medium
Piemonte
4
(50/100)
Medium
Sardegna
4
(50/100)
Medium
Umbria
4
(50/100)
Medium
Lazio
1
(12/100)
Low
P.A. Bolzano
1
(12/100)
Low
P.A. Trento
1
(12/100)
Low
Valle d'Aosta
1
(12/100)
Low
Basilicata
0
(0/100)
N.A.
Molise
0
(0/100)
N.A.
Sicilia
0
(0/100)
N.A.