Rating classes
Public services and relations with citizens
Territorial distribution of the rating
| Rating class | ND - Unavailable | F - Fallible | P - Poor | P+ - Weak | PP - Satisfactory | PP+ - Good | PPP - Very Good | PPP+ - Excellent | ND - Unavailable | F - Fallible | P - Poor | P+ - Weak | PP - Satisfactory | PP+ - Good | PPP - Very Good | PPP+ - Excellent | ND - Unavailable | F - Fallible | P - Poor | P+ - Weak | PP - Satisfactory | PP+ - Good | PPP - Very Good | PPP+ - Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Center | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| South | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class
| Rating class | Number of administrations |
|---|---|
| ND - Unavailable | 0 |
| F - Fallible | 0 |
| P - Poor | 8 |
| P+ - Weak | 4 |
| PP - Satisfactory | 1 |
| PP+ - Good | 5 |
| PPP - Very Good | 2 |
| PPP+ - Excellent | 1 |
Public Administrations Ranking
| Public Administration | Score | Rating class |
|---|---|---|
| Toscana | 90 | 7 | PPP+ - Excellent |
| Emilia-Romagna | 86 | 6 | PPP - Very Good |
| Piemonte | 81 | 6 | PPP - Very Good |
| Liguria | 71 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Veneto | 71 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Lombardia | 70 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Friuli-Venezia Giulia | 62 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| P.A. Bolzano | 62 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| P.A. Trento | 58 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Abruzzo | 49 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Sicilia | 48 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Valle d'Aosta | 45 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Sardegna | 40 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Umbria | 38 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Puglia | 35 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Lazio | 34 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Marche | 34 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Basilicata | 30 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Calabria | 23 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Campania | 23 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Molise | 23 | 2 | P - Poor |
Download
All data
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 27.0 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 5.5 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 61.3 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 3.6 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.05 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 11.4 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 16.5 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 97.3 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 30.2 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 4.8 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 104.4 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 3.6 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 3.38 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 10.6 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 15.0 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 90.28 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 34.7 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 5.7 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 115.5 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 2.5 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 3.41 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 9.8 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 11.7 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 90.67 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 46.9 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 11.9 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 113.2 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 2.8 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.61 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 12.0 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 2.6 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 95.83 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 21.0 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 5.3 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 91.2 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 3.8 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 3.12 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 11.0 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 6.5 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 85.71 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 11.0 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 11.0 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 32.1 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 4.5 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 85.4 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 2.8 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.47 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 11.8 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 9.1 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 91.26 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 11.0 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 10.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 23.5 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 6.3 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 116.8 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 3.3 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 1.75 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 12.0 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 3.0 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 93.75 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 11.0 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 20.0 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 4.4 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 111.7 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 0.5 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.65 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 9.4 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 6.5 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 86.11 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 111.0 | High score for high values | 10 | Trend not available | High | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 5.0 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 13.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 150.8 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 3.0 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.91 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 11.4 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 6.5 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 88.31 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 11.0 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 16.4 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 14.5 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 42.0 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 4.3 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 1.04 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 15.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 7.8 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 94.59 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 11.0 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 11.0 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 29.6 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 5.9 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 52.8 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 3.9 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.78 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 15.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 9.1 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | n.d. | High score for high values | 0 | Trend not available | N.A. |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 10.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 10.4 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 13.6 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 114.2 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 0.5 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.27 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 8.4 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 7.8 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 93.75 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 14.6 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 5.4 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 51.8 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 1.94 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 13.9 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 9.0 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | n.d. | High score for high values | 0 | Trend not available | N.A. |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 10.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 21.7 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 11.3 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 65.8 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 2.5 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.25 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 13.7 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 6.5 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 77.59 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 11.0 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 24.4 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 7.8 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 36.4 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 1.8 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.64 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 15.6 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 18.0 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 78.57 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | n.d. | High score for high values | 0 | Trend not available | N.A. | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | n.d. | High score for high values | 0 | Trend not available | N.A. | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 47.6 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 7.1 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 42.2 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 2.2 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 1.45 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 15.3 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 6.5 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 77.27 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 10.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 9.9 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 11.7 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 82.3 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 3.3 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.52 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 13.1 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 3.9 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 90.48 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | n.d. | High score for high values | 0 | Trend not available | N.A. | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | n.d. | High score for high values | 0 | Trend not available | N.A. | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 12.6 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 24.9 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 71.8 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 3.7 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 1.63 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 15.6 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 4.5 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 66.67 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 11.0 | High score for high values | 5 | Trend not available | Medium | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 11.4 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 18.7 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 38.5 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 1.0 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 1.95 | High score for low values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 15.9 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 1.5 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | 10.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | 0.0 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 40.8 | High score for high values | 10 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 8.7 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 18.5 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 2.3 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.68 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 16.8 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 1.5 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | 68.35 | High score for high values | 1 | Trend not available | Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Public services and relations with citizens
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) | value | n.d. | High score for high values | 0 | Trend not available | N.A. | |||||||||
| Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) | value | n.d. | High score for high values | 0 | Trend not available | N.A. | |||||||||
| Landline high-speed internet access covering | % | 6.4 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Hospital emigration | % | 27.3 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 69.5 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Integrated home care services | % | 3.2 | High score for high values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants | v/ 10k inhabitants | 2.58 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita | € p.c. | 13.5 | High score for low values | 5 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Citizens involvement | value | 2.6 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| FOIA register: accepted requests | % | n.d. | High score for high values | 0 | Trend not available | N.A. |