Rating classes
Environment
Territorial distribution of the rating
| Rating class | ND - Unavailable | F - Fallible | P - Poor | P+ - Weak | PP - Satisfactory | PP+ - Good | PPP - Very Good | PPP+ - Excellent | ND - Unavailable | F - Fallible | P - Poor | P+ - Weak | PP - Satisfactory | PP+ - Good | PPP - Very Good | PPP+ - Excellent | ND - Unavailable | F - Fallible | P - Poor | P+ - Weak | PP - Satisfactory | PP+ - Good | PPP - Very Good | PPP+ - Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Center | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| South | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class
| Rating class | Number of administrations |
|---|---|
| ND - Unavailable | 0 |
| F - Fallible | 0 |
| P - Poor | 5 |
| P+ - Weak | 3 |
| PP - Satisfactory | 7 |
| PP+ - Good | 6 |
| PPP - Very Good | 0 |
| PPP+ - Excellent | 0 |
Public Administrations Ranking
| Public Administration | Score | Rating class |
|---|---|---|
| P.A. Bolzano | 77 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Basilicata | 76 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Molise | 76 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| P.A. Trento | 70 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Sardegna | 69 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Calabria | 64 | 5 | PP+ - Good |
| Piemonte | 59 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Valle d'Aosta | 59 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Sicilia | 56 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Puglia | 54 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Lazio | 52 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Abruzzo | 51 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Marche | 50 | 4 | PP - Satisfactory |
| Friuli-Venezia Giulia | 48 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Umbria | 44 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Lombardia | 43 | 3 | P+ - Weak |
| Veneto | 37 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Campania | 32 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Emilia-Romagna | 31 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Liguria | 29 | 2 | P - Poor |
| Toscana | 29 | 2 | P - Poor |
Download
All data
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 100.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 2.72 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 0.3 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 2.2 | High score for low values | 14 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 2.7 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 2.3 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 9.8 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 241.1 | High score for high values | 14 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 40.0 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 3.17 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 4.0 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 19.0 | High score for low values | 7 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 3.2 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 7.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 1.1 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 109.6 | High score for high values | 14 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 33.3 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 3.92 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 0.3 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 79.3 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 3.9 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 6.1 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 2.3 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 83.0 | High score for high values | 14 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 83.3 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 3.47 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 0.6 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 21.8 | High score for low values | 7 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 3.7 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 2.0 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 25.9 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 125.3 | High score for high values | 14 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 30.3 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 3.32 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 12.4 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 23.4 | High score for low values | 7 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 3.3 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 1.3 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 7.5 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 37.6 | High score for high values | 7 |
|
Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 40.0 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 5.06 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 0.7 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 27.4 | High score for low values | 7 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 5.1 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 3.3 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 12.8 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 80.1 | High score for high values | 14 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 94.3 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 6.68 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 42.7 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 12.6 | High score for low values | 14 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 6.7 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 1.9 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 4.9 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 43.5 | High score for high values | 7 |
|
Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 100.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 2.15 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 0.7 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 38.2 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 2.1 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 12.1 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 9.1 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 314.5 | High score for high values | 14 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 50.0 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 6.52 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 3.2 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 58.9 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 6.5 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 1.8 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 2.6 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 26.0 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 83.0 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 8.2 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 6.5 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 33.7 | High score for low values | 7 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 8.2 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 1.4 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 3.4 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 54.7 | High score for high values | 14 |
|
High |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 68.0 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 8.13 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 4.2 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 15.7 | High score for low values | 7 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 8.1 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 1.6 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 3.2 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 15.3 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 81.8 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 5.02 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 0.6 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 29.2 | High score for low values | 7 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 5.0 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 5.6 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 7.2 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 42.4 | High score for high values | 7 |
|
Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 66.7 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 6.94 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 0.2 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 48.1 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 6.9 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 2.2 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 5.2 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 26.8 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 85.7 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 8.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 18.4 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 11.4 | High score for low values | 14 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 8.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 0.4 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 9.9 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 33.1 | High score for high values | 7 |
|
Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 76.2 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 5.27 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 0.8 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 37.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 5.3 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 2.0 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 7.2 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 37.6 | High score for high values | 7 |
|
Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 97.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 12.12 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 8.2 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 3.5 | High score for low values | 14 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 12.1 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 0.5 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 4.4 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 27.3 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 100.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 11.9 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 1.7 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 14.7 | High score for low values | 14 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 11.9 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 0.1 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 11.7 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 29.3 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 89.3 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 10.49 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 5.8 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 1.6 | High score for low values | 14 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 10.4 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 5.0 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 5.1 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 31.4 | High score for high values | 7 |
|
Medium |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 89.4 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 8.9 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 1.7 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 9.2 | High score for low values | 14 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 8.9 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 2.0 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 62.5 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 22.1 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 67.9 | High score for low values | 12 |
|
High | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 7.25 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 5.1 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 36.2 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 7.2 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 5.9 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 17.4 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 8.3 | High score for high values | 1 |
|
Low |
Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment
| Indicator name | Unit of measure | Value | Scoring criteria | Score | Trend | Evaluation of the indicator | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality - PM 2.5 | % | 76.5 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Land consumption | % | 6.17 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Contaminated sites | ‰ inhabitants | 5.1 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Urban waste disposal at landfill | % | 36.4 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering | % | 6.2 | High score for low values | 6 |
|
Medium | |||||||||
| Population exposed to landslide risk | % | 4.2 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Population exposed to flood risk | % | 25.5 | High score for low values | 1 |
|
Low | |||||||||
| Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources | % | 42.7 | High score for high values | 7 |
|
Medium |