• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Environment

Filter by:

Territorial distribution of the rating

Rating class ND - Unavailable F - Fallible P - Poor P+ - Weak PP - Satisfactory PP+ - Good PPP - Very Good PPP+ - Excellent ND - Unavailable F - Fallible P - Poor P+ - Weak PP - Satisfactory PP+ - Good PPP - Very Good PPP+ - Excellent ND - Unavailable F - Fallible P - Poor P+ - Weak PP - Satisfactory PP+ - Good PPP - Very Good PPP+ - Excellent
North 0 0 4 1 2 2 0 0
Center 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0
South 0 0 1 2 0 5 0 0

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 5
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Valle d'Aosta
69/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
51/100
Worst score
Liguria
32/100

Public Administrations Ranking

Public Administration Score Rating class
Valle d'Aosta 69 5 | PP+ - Good
Molise 68 5 | PP+ - Good
P.A. Bolzano 66 5 | PP+ - Good
Basilicata 63 5 | PP+ - Good
Sardegna 63 5 | PP+ - Good
Calabria 62 5 | PP+ - Good
Abruzzo 61 5 | PP+ - Good
P.A. Trento 57 4 | PP - Satisfactory
Umbria 55 4 | PP - Satisfactory
Marche 51 4 | PP - Satisfactory
Piemonte 51 4 | PP - Satisfactory
Friuli-Venezia Giulia 48 3 | P+ - Weak
Lazio 47 3 | P+ - Weak
Puglia 47 3 | P+ - Weak
Toscana 46 3 | P+ - Weak
Sicilia 40 3 | P+ - Weak
Lombardia 38 2 | P - Poor
Emilia-Romagna 37 2 | P - Poor
Campania 36 2 | P - Poor
Veneto 33 2 | P - Poor
Liguria 32 2 | P - Poor
Download All data Metadata
Public Administration
Administrative Capacity Index: score
Chronological trend
Rating class
69/100
Trend not available
PP+ - Good

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 75.0 High score for low values 6 Medium
Land consumption % 2.15 High score for low values 12 High
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 0.7 High score for low values 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 38.2 High score for low values 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 2.2 High score for low values 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 255.1 High score for high values 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk % 12.1 High score for low values 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk % 9.1 High score for low values 5 Medium
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 320.7891 High score for high values 12 High
68/100
Trend not available
PP+ - Good

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 50.0 High score for low values 12 High
Land consumption % 3.92 High score for low values 12 High
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 0.3 High score for low values 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 90.4 High score for low values 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 3.9 High score for low values 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 85.1 High score for high values 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk % 6.1 High score for low values 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk % 2.3 High score for low values 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. n.d. High score for high values 0 N.A.
66/100
Trend not available
PP+ - Good

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 100.0 High score for low values 1 Low
Land consumption % n.d. High score for low values 0 N.A.
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 0.3 High score for low values 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 1.4 High score for low values 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 2.7 High score for low values 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 192.7 High score for high values 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk % 2.3 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk % 9.8 High score for low values 5 Medium
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 101.7674 High score for high values 12 High
63/100
Trend not available
PP+ - Good

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 8.3 High score for low values 12 High
Land consumption % 3.17 High score for low values 12 High
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 4.0 High score for low values 5 Medium
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 44.0 High score for low values 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 3.2 High score for low values 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 111.5 High score for high values 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk % 7.0 High score for low values 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk % 1.1 High score for low values 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. n.d. High score for high values 0 N.A.
63/100
Trend not available
PP+ - Good

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 6.1 High score for low values 12 High
Land consumption % 3.32 High score for low values 12 High
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 12.4 High score for low values 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 27.9 High score for low values 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 3.4 High score for low values 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 39.0 High score for high values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 1.3 High score for low values 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk % 7.5 High score for low values 5 Medium
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. n.d. High score for high values 0 N.A.
62/100
Trend not available
PP+ - Good

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 50.0 High score for low values 12 High
Land consumption % 5.06 High score for low values 12 High
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 0.7 High score for low values 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 27.6 High score for low values 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 5.1 High score for low values 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 77.7 High score for high values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 3.3 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk % 12.8 High score for low values 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. n.d. High score for high values 0 N.A.
61/100
Trend not available
PP+ - Good

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 81.8 High score for low values 6 Medium
Land consumption % 5.02 High score for low values 12 High
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 0.6 High score for low values 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 27.5 High score for low values 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 5.1 High score for low values 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 45.9 High score for high values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 5.6 High score for low values 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk % 7.2 High score for low values 5 Medium
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 14.5734 High score for high values 6 Medium
57/100
Trend not available
PP - Satisfactory

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 100.0 High score for low values 1 Low
Land consumption % n.d. High score for low values 0 N.A.
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 0.6 High score for low values 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 18.1 High score for low values 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 3.5 High score for low values 10 High
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 103.3 High score for high values 12 High
Population exposed to landslide risk % 2.0 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk % 25.9 High score for low values 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 74.6351 High score for high values 12 High
55/100
Trend not available
PP - Satisfactory

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 57.1 High score for low values 6 Medium
Land consumption % 5.27 High score for low values 6 Medium
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 0.8 High score for low values 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 33.6 High score for low values 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 5.3 High score for low values 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 42.6 High score for high values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 2.0 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk % 7.2 High score for low values 5 Medium
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 14.4471 High score for high values 6 Medium
51/100
Trend not available
PP - Satisfactory

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 53.3 High score for low values 12 High
Land consumption % 6.94 High score for low values 6 Medium
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 0.2 High score for low values 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 50.1 High score for low values 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 7.0 High score for low values 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 25.8 High score for high values 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk % 2.2 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk % 5.2 High score for low values 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. n.d. High score for high values 0 N.A.
51/100
Trend not available
PP - Satisfactory

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 87.5 High score for low values 1 Low
Land consumption % 6.68 High score for low values 6 Medium
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 42.7 High score for low values 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 12.2 High score for low values 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 7.0 High score for low values 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 36.9 High score for high values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 1.9 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk % 4.9 High score for low values 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 23.7716 High score for high values 6 Medium
48/100
Trend not available
P+ - Weak

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 88.0 High score for low values 1 Low
Land consumption % 8.0 High score for low values 6 Medium
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 18.4 High score for low values 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 5.2 High score for low values 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 8.1 High score for low values 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 31.5 High score for high values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 0.4 High score for low values 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk % 9.9 High score for low values 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 41.9294 High score for high values 6 Medium
47/100
Trend not available
P+ - Weak

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 66.0 High score for low values 6 Medium
Land consumption % 8.13 High score for low values 1 Low
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 4.2 High score for low values 5 Medium
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 13.7 High score for low values 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 8.3 High score for low values 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 16.0 High score for high values 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk % 1.6 High score for low values 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk % 3.2 High score for low values 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 6.7698 High score for high values 1 Low
47/100
Trend not available
P+ - Weak

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 69.2 High score for low values 6 Medium
Land consumption % 8.2 High score for low values 1 Low
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 6.5 High score for low values 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 28.1 High score for low values 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 8.2 High score for low values 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 55.3 High score for high values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 1.4 High score for low values 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk % 3.4 High score for low values 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 8.3804 High score for high values 1 Low
46/100
Trend not available
P+ - Weak

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 73.5 High score for low values 6 Medium
Land consumption % 6.17 High score for low values 6 Medium
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 5.1 High score for low values 5 Medium
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 35.2 High score for low values 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 6.2 High score for low values 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 41.3 High score for high values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 4.2 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk % 25.5 High score for low values 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 14.5185 High score for high values 6 Medium
40/100
Trend not available
P+ - Weak

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 66.0 High score for low values 6 Medium
Land consumption % 6.52 High score for low values 6 Medium
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 3.2 High score for low values 5 Medium
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 51.5 High score for low values 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 6.5 High score for low values 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 28.0 High score for high values 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk % 1.8 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk % 2.6 High score for low values 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. n.d. High score for high values 0 N.A.
38/100
Trend not available
P - Poor

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 97.1 High score for low values 1 Low
Land consumption % 12.12 High score for low values 1 Low
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 8.2 High score for low values 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 3.6 High score for low values 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 12.4 High score for low values 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 24.4 High score for high values 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk % 0.5 High score for low values 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk % 4.4 High score for low values 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 7.178 High score for high values 1 Low
37/100
Trend not available
P - Poor

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 87.2 High score for low values 1 Low
Land consumption % 8.9 High score for low values 1 Low
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 1.7 High score for low values 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 7.5 High score for low values 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 9.0 High score for low values 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 20.5 High score for high values 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk % 2.0 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk % 62.5 High score for low values 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 15.5653 High score for high values 6 Medium
36/100
Trend not available
P - Poor

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 79.4 High score for low values 6 Medium
Land consumption % 10.49 High score for low values 1 Low
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 5.8 High score for low values 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 0.0 High score for low values 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 10.5 High score for low values 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 33.0 High score for high values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 5.0 High score for low values 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk % 5.1 High score for low values 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. n.d. High score for high values 0 N.A.
33/100
Trend not available
P - Poor

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 100.0 High score for low values 1 Low
Land consumption % 11.9 High score for low values 1 Low
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 1.7 High score for low values 10 High
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 16.1 High score for low values 5 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 11.9 High score for low values 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 26.5 High score for high values 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk % 0.1 High score for low values 12 High
Population exposed to flood risk % 11.7 High score for low values 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 9.9999 High score for high values 1 Low
32/100
Trend not available
P - Poor

Indicators of the macro-indicator - Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 56.7 High score for low values 6 Medium
Land consumption % 7.25 High score for low values 6 Medium
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 5.1 High score for low values 5 Medium
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 39.6 High score for low values 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 7.8 High score for low values 5 Medium
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 7.3 High score for high values 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk % 5.9 High score for low values 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk % 17.4 High score for low values 1 Low
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection € p.c. 12.3859 High score for high values 6 Medium