• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Public Administration

Emilia-Romagna

Compare
Comparative values by:
Download Report All data

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

PP+ - Good

Rating

70 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
70/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
52/100
Worst score
Molise
32/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Administrative capacity Index: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Administrative Capacity Index

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial situation

PP+ - Good
Download All data

Rating

79 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
79/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
51/100
Worst score
Sicilia
15/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Spending capacity
  • Spending rigidity
  • Debt per capita
  • Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds
  • Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita
  • EU funds management - effected payments

Weaknesses

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial situation

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy % 89.18 High score for high values 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita € p.c. 2,387.29 High score for low values 4 Medium
Collection capacity % 84.16 High score for high values 5 Medium
Spending capacity % 90.65 High score for high values 10 High
Spending rigidity % 1.84 High score for low values 10 High
Debt per capita € p.c. 287.84 High score for low values 10 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues % 103.11 High score for high values 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities % 62.05 High score for low values 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds % 0.0 High score for low values 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita € p.c. 21.0 High score for high values 10 High
EU funds management - effected payments % 55.0 High score for high values 10 High

2 Governance

PP+ - Good
Download All data

Rating

78 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
78/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
55/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • E- Government
  • Performance
  • Working from home (WFH)
  • Public works incompleted
  • Subsidiary companies
  • Anti-corruption measures undertaken

Weaknesses

  • Public Real Estate properties - management

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
E- Government value 22.8 High score for high values 12 High
Degree of digitalization value 0.3 High score for high values 6 Medium
Performance value 111.0 High score for high values 12 High
Working from home (WFH) value 11.0 High score for high values 10 High
Public works incompleted number 0.0 High score for low values 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report value 101.0 High score for high values 5 Trend not available Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management € p.c. -2.35 High score for high values 1 Low
Subsidiary companies absolute value 86.67 High score for high values 12 High
Anti-corruption measures undertaken value 16.8 High score for high values 12 High

3 Personnel management

PP+ - Good
Download All data

Rating

74 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
74/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
48/100
Worst score
Molise
28/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Per capita personnel expenditure
  • Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants
  • Personnel with a degree on total personnel
  • Average days of absence (sick leave)
  • Women managers on total managers
  • Average of training days

Weaknesses

  • Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expenditure € p.c. 38.71 High score for low values 10 High
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants val./1.000 ab. 0.75 High score for low values 10 Trend not available High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel % 3.29 High score for low values 5 Medium
Average age years 53.06 High score for low values 4 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel % 60.04 High score for high values 8 High
Average days of absence (sick leave) days per person 14.02 High score for low values 8 High
Total managers on total personnel % 3.27 High score for low values 5 Trend not available Medium
Women managers on total managers % 46.79 High score for high values 8 Trend not available High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers % 100.0 High score for low values 1 Low
Average of training days days per person 3.21 High score for high values 10 Trend not available High
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers variance 83.33 High score for high values 5 Medium

4 Public services and relations with citizens

PPP - Very Good
Download All data

Rating

86 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Toscana
90/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
51/100
Worst score
Calabria
Molise
Campania
23/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Efficiency indicator - reporting (general)
  • Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general)
  • Landline high-speed internet access covering
  • Hospital migration
  • Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants
  • Integrated Home Care services
  • Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure
  • Citizens involvement

Weaknesses

  • Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services and relations with citizens

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) value 111.0 High score for high values 10 Trend not available High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) value 111.0 High score for high values 10 Trend not available High
Landline high-speed internet access covering % 30.2 High score for high values 10 High
Hospital migration % 4.8 High score for low values 10 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants val./10.000 ab. 104.4 High score for high values 10 High
Integrated Home Care services % 3.6 High score for high values 10 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants val./10.000 ab. 3.38 High score for low values 1 Low
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure € p.c. 10.6 High score for low values 10 High
Citizens involvement value 15.0 High score for high values 10 High
FOIA register: accepted requests % 90.28 High score for high values 5 Medium

5 Public tenders and relations with suppliers

P+ - Weak
Download All data

Rating

47 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
Umbria
86/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
18/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Timeliness of payments indicator
  • Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants

Weaknesses

  • Recurring contractors in direct procurements
  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount
  • Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders and relations with suppliers

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements % 38.42 High score for low values 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number % 72.23 High score for low values 7 Trend not available Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount % 43.18 High score for low values 1 Low
Timeliness of payments indicator days -15.27 High score for low values 16 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers € p.c. 2.67 High score for low values 7 Medium
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants val./10.000 ab. 0.21 High score for low values 14 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year % 74.22 High score for high values 1 Low

6 Environment

P - Poor
Download All data

Rating

31 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
77/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Toscana
Liguria
29/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Urban waste disposal at landfill

Weaknesses

  • Air quality - PM 2.5
  • Land consumption
  • Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering
  • Population exposed to flood risk
  • Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources

Indicators of the macro-indicator Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 89.4 High score for low values 1 Low
Land consumption % 8.9 High score for low values 1 Low
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 1.7 High score for low values 6 Medium
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 9.2 High score for low values 14 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 8.9 High score for low values 1 Low
Population exposed to landslide risk % 2.0 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to flood risk % 62.5 High score for low values 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 22.1 High score for high values 1 Low