• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Public Administration

Liguria

Compare
Comparative values by:
Download Report All data

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

PP+ - Good

Rating

63 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
70/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
52/100
Worst score
Molise
32/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Administrative capacity Index: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Administrative Capacity Index

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial situation

P+ - Weak
Download All data

Rating

48 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
79/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
51/100
Worst score
Sicilia
15/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Spending capacity
  • Debt per capita

Weaknesses

  • Financial autonomy
  • Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues
  • New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities
  • Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial situation

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy % 83.77 High score for high values 1 Low
Financial pressure per capita € p.c. 2,416.82 High score for low values 4 Medium
Collection capacity % 84.3 High score for high values 5 Medium
Spending capacity % 89.18 High score for high values 10 High
Spending rigidity % 6.64 High score for low values 5 Medium
Debt per capita € p.c. 522.23 High score for low values 10 High
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues % 101.07 High score for high values 1 Low
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities % 79.15 High score for low values 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds % 67.25 High score for low values 1 Low
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita € p.c. -20.37 High score for high values 5 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments % 42.0 High score for high values 5 Medium

2 Governance

PP+ - Good
Download All data

Rating

74 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
78/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
55/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Degree of digitalization
  • Performance
  • Working from home (WFH)
  • Public works incompleted
  • Subsidiary companies
  • Anti-corruption measures undertaken

Weaknesses

  • E- Government
  • Public Real Estate properties - report

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
E- Government value 11.4 High score for high values 1 Low
Degree of digitalization value 0.45 High score for high values 12 High
Performance value 111.0 High score for high values 12 High
Working from home (WFH) value 11.0 High score for high values 10 High
Public works incompleted number 0.0 High score for low values 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report value 1.0 High score for high values 1 Trend not available Low
Public Real Estate properties - management € p.c. -0.25 High score for high values 6 Medium
Subsidiary companies absolute value 100.0 High score for high values 12 High
Anti-corruption measures undertaken value 20.4 High score for high values 12 High

3 Personnel management

PP - Satisfactory
Download All data

Rating

51 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
74/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
48/100
Worst score
Molise
28/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Average days of absence (sick leave)
  • Women managers on total managers
  • Average of training days

Weaknesses

  • Total managers on total personnel
  • Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expenditure € p.c. 46.27 High score for low values 5 Medium
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants val./1.000 ab. 1.0 High score for low values 5 Trend not available Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel % 4.14 High score for low values 5 Medium
Average age years 53.05 High score for low values 4 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel % 48.05 High score for high values 4 Medium
Average days of absence (sick leave) days per person 13.75 High score for low values 8 High
Total managers on total personnel % 4.62 High score for low values 1 Trend not available Low
Women managers on total managers % 51.43 High score for high values 8 Trend not available High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers % n.d. High score for low values 0 Trend not available N.A.
Average of training days days per person 2.01 High score for high values 10 Trend not available High
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers variance 38.35 High score for high values 1 Low

4 Public services and relations with citizens

PP+ - Good
Download All data

Rating

71 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Toscana
90/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
51/100
Worst score
Calabria
Molise
Campania
23/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Efficiency indicator - reporting (general)
  • Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general)
  • Landline high-speed internet access covering
  • Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants
  • FOIA register: accepted requests

Weaknesses

  • Citizens involvement

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services and relations with citizens

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) value 111.0 High score for high values 10 Trend not available High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) value 111.0 High score for high values 10 Trend not available High
Landline high-speed internet access covering % 46.9 High score for high values 10 High
Hospital migration % 11.9 High score for low values 5 Medium
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants val./10.000 ab. 113.2 High score for high values 10 High
Integrated Home Care services % 2.8 High score for high values 5 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants val./10.000 ab. 2.61 High score for low values 5 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure € p.c. 12.0 High score for low values 5 Medium
Citizens involvement value 2.6 High score for high values 1 Low
FOIA register: accepted requests % 95.83 High score for high values 10 High

5 Public tenders and relations with suppliers

PPP - Very Good
Download All data

Rating

86 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
Umbria
86/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
18/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - number
  • Timeliness of payments indicator
  • Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers
  • Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants
  • Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year

Weaknesses

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders and relations with suppliers

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements % 27.8 High score for low values 7 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number % 34.2 High score for low values 14 Trend not available High
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount % 18.02 High score for low values 7 Medium
Timeliness of payments indicator days -12.69 High score for low values 16 High
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers € p.c. 0.28 High score for low values 14 High
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants val./10.000 ab. 0.3 High score for low values 14 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year % 82.73 High score for high values 14 High

6 Environment

P - Poor
Download All data

Rating

29 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
77/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Toscana
Liguria
29/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Air quality - PM 2.5

Weaknesses

  • Contaminated sites
  • Urban waste disposal at landfill
  • Population exposed to landslide risk
  • Population exposed to flood risk
  • Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources

Indicators of the macro-indicator Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 67.9 High score for low values 12 High
Land consumption % 7.25 High score for low values 6 Medium
Contaminated sites ‰ inhabitants 5.1 High score for low values 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill % 36.2 High score for low values 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 7.2 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 5.9 High score for low values 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk % 17.4 High score for low values 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 8.3 High score for high values 1 Low