• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Public Administration

Toscana

Compare
Comparative values by:
Download Report All data

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

PP+ - Good

Rating

62 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
70/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
52/100
Worst score
Molise
32/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Administrative capacity Index: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Administrative Capacity Index

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial situation

PP - Satisfactory
Download All data

Rating

54 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
79/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
51/100
Worst score
Sicilia
15/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Spending rigidity
  • EU funds management - effected payments

Weaknesses

  • New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities
  • Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial situation

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy % 88.69 High score for high values 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita € p.c. 2,410.55 High score for low values 4 Medium
Collection capacity % 85.84 High score for high values 5 Medium
Spending capacity % 84.61 High score for high values 5 Medium
Spending rigidity % 2.53 High score for low values 10 High
Debt per capita € p.c. 1,053.65 High score for low values 5 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues % 104.16 High score for high values 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities % 80.51 High score for low values 1 Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds % 17.89 High score for low values 1 Low
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita € p.c. -18.77 High score for high values 5 Medium
EU funds management - effected payments % 59.0 High score for high values 10 High

2 Governance

PP+ - Good
Download All data

Rating

61 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
78/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
55/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Target achievement
  • Smart Working
  • Public works incompleted

Weaknesses

  • Public Real Estate properties - report

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
E- Government value 18.6 High score for high values 6 Medium
Degree of digitization value 0.32 High score for high values 6 Medium
Target achievement value 111.0 High score for high values 12 High
Smart Working value 11.0 High score for high values 10 High
Public works incompleted numero 0.0 High score for low values 8 High
Public Real Estate properties - report value 100.0 High score for high values 1 Trend not available Low
Public Real Estate properties - management € p.c. -0.57 High score for high values 6 Medium
Subsidiary companies ABS 78.57 High score for high values 6 Medium
Anti-corruption measures undertaken value 15.6 High score for high values 6 Medium

3 Personnel management

PP+ - Good
Download All data

Rating

63 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
74/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
48/100
Worst score
Molise
28/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants
  • Personnel with a degree on total personnel
  • Average days of absence (sick leave)

Weaknesses

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expenditure € p.c. 44.71 High score for low values 5 Medium
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants val./1.000 residents 0.85 High score for low values 10 Trend not available High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel % 1.2 High score for low values 5 Medium
Average age years 53.56 High score for low values 4 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel % 53.54 High score for high values 8 High
Average days of absence (sick leave) average days 13.14 High score for low values 8 High
Total managers on total personnel % 3.22 High score for low values 5 Trend not available Medium
Women managers on total managers % 38.0 High score for high values 4 Trend not available Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers % 92.41 High score for low values 4 Medium
Average of training days average days 0.73 High score for high values 5 Trend not available Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers variance 138.6 High score for high values 5 Medium

4 Public services and relations with citizens

PPP+ - Excellent
Download All data

Rating

90 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Toscana
90/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
51/100
Worst score
Calabria
Molise
Campania
23/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Efficiency indicator - reporting (general)
  • Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general)
  • Hospital emigration
  • Integrated home care services
  • Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants
  • Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita
  • Citizens involvement
  • FOIA register: accepted requests

Weaknesses

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services and relations with citizens

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Efficiency indicator - reporting (general) value 111.0 High score for high values 10 Trend not available High
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (general) value 111.0 High score for high values 10 Trend not available High
Landline high-speed internet access covering % 27.0 High score for high values 5 Medium
Hospital emigration % 5.5 High score for low values 10 High
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants v/ 10k inhabitants 61.3 High score for high values 5 Medium
Integrated home care services % 3.6 High score for high values 10 High
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants v/ 10k inhabitants 2.05 High score for low values 10 High
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita € p.c. 11.4 High score for low values 10 High
Citizens involvement value 16.5 High score for high values 10 High
FOIA register: accepted requests % 97.3 High score for high values 10 High

5 Public tenders and relations with suppliers

PP - Satisfactory
Download All data

Rating

54 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
Umbria
86/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
18/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount
  • Timeliness of payments indicator
  • Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens

Weaknesses

  • Recurring contractors in direct procurements
  • Direct procurements on global public tenders - number
  • Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders and relations with suppliers

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements % 30.93 High score for low values 1 Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number % 79.53 High score for low values 1 Trend not available Low
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount % 2.92 High score for low values 14 High
Timeliness of payments indicator days -27.03 High score for low values 16 High
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers € p.c. 1.29 High score for low values 7 Medium
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens v/ 10k inhabitants 0.26 High score for low values 14 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year % 70.31 High score for high values 1 Low

6 Environment

P - Poor
Download All data

Rating

29 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
77/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Toscana
Liguria
29/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

Weaknesses

  • Contaminated sites
  • Urban waste disposal into dump
  • Population exposed to landslide risk
  • Population exposed to flood risk

Indicators of the macro-indicator Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 76.5 High score for low values 6 Medium
Land consumption % 6.17 High score for low values 6 Medium
Contaminated sites thousandths 5.1 High score for low values 1 Low
Urban waste disposal into dump % 36.4 High score for low values 1 Low
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 6.2 High score for low values 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk % 4.2 High score for low values 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk % 25.5 High score for low values 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources % 42.7 High score for high values 7 Medium