• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)

Compare Public Administrations

Administrative Capacity Index

P+ - Weak
44/100

Macro-indicators list

PP - Satisfactory
50/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Financial autonomy 87.5 4 Medium
Financial pressure per capita 2,423.3 8 High
Collection capacity 81.6 5 Medium
Spending capacity 77.5 5 Medium
Spending rigidity 3.2 4 Medium
Per capita debt from financing 1,410.1 1 Low
Off-budget debts recognized and financed 0.3 1 Low
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 97.3 1 Low
New liabilities generated in the current period on the current accumulated liabilities 64.0 4 Medium
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 0.0 8 High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita 1.4 8 High
EU funds management - effected payments 60.0 1 Low

P - Poor
34/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
E- Government 110.0 1 Low
Degree of digitalization 7.5 8 High
Performance 110.0 4 Medium
Working from home (WFH) 101.0 4 Medium
Public real estate properties - report 1.0 1 Low
Public Real Estate properties - management -0.9 1 Low
Subsidiary companies 62.5 1 Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 8.8 5 Medium
Service outsourcing 5.9 1 Low
Efficiency indicator - reporting 0 N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision 0 N.A.
Average completion time for public works 0 N.A.
Compliance with public works supervision 94.0 8 High

PP+ - Good
71/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Per capita personnel expenditure 39.4 10 High
Personnel with a permanent contract per 1,000 inhabitants 0.8 10 High
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 0.4 10 High
Average age 52.1 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 56.6 8 High
Average days of absence (except holidays and training) 9.9 8 High
Average of training days 0.7 5 Medium
Total managers on total personnel 3.4 5 Medium
Women managers on total managers 47.7 8 High
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 275.3 1 Low
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 11.4 1 Low

P - Poor
33/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Landline high-speed internet access covering 55.1 8 High
Per capita expenditure on transport and right to mobility 0 N.A.
Per capita expenditure on economic development and competitiveness 0 N.A.
Per capita expenditure on labour policies and vocational education 15.4 1 Low
Hospital migration 9.2 4 Medium
Beds in residential healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 18.8 1 Low
Integrated Home Care services 2.3 4 Medium
Accredited private healthcare facilities per 10k inhabitants 2.7 4 Medium
Per capita territorial pharmaceutical expenditure 12.5 1 Low
Essential levels of care - prevention area 78.4 4 Medium
Essential levels of care - territorial area 57.5 1 Low
Essential levels of care - hospital area 62.7 1 Low
Services guaranteed in time (priority class B) 96.7 4 Medium

P+ - Weak
46/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 79.4 4 Medium
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 11.7 4 Medium
Timeliness of payments indicator 4.7 10 Medium
Per capita total amount of debts with suppliers 22.8 2 Low
Number of corporate creditor per 10k inhabitants 1.5 8 Medium
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 86.4 16 High
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during previous years 44.2 2 Low

P - Poor
36/100
Indicator Value Score Evaluation
Air quality - PM 2.5 79.4 6 Medium
Land consumption 10.5 1 Low
Contaminated sites 5.8 1 Low
Urban waste disposal at landfill 0.0 10 High
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 10.5 1 Low
Electricity consumption covered by renewable sources 33.0 6 Medium
Population exposed to landslide risk 5.0 1 Low
Population exposed to flood risk 5.1 10 High
Per capita expenditure on sustainable development and environmental protection 0 N.A.