• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Public Administration

Sardegna

Comparative values by:

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

P - Poor

Rating

39 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

71/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Molise
33/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor* 3
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 6
PP+ - Good 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Administrative capacity Index: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Macro-indicator Average score of Public Administrations assessed Benchmark Public Administration for each macro-area Score of the Public Administration
Financial situation 56 91 51
Governance 56 82 30
Personnel management 54 95 46
Public services and relations with citizens 54 88 35
Public tenders and relations with suppliers 44 84 21
Environment 55 94 64

Administrative Capacity Index

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial situation

PP - Satisfactory

Rating

51 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

91/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Basilicata
20/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 2
P+ - Weak 6
PP - Satisfactory* 5
PP+ - Good 7
PPP - Very Good 0
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Financial autonomy
  • Collection capacity
  • Debt per capita

Weaknesses

  • Financial pressure per capita
  • New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities
  • Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds
  • Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial situation

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy 96.34 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 95.4 high | High
2021 96.34 high | High
High
Financial pressure per capita 4,482.34 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 4513.5 low | Low
2021 4482.34 low | Low
Low
Collection capacity 95.78 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 89.5 medium | Medium
2021 95.78 high | High
High
Spending capacity 88.98 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 93.0 high | High
2021 88.98 medium | Medium
Medium
Spending rigidity 4.25 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 4.1 medium | Medium
2021 4.25 medium | Medium
Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues 92.22 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 112.1 high | High
2021 92.22 medium | Medium
Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities 73.58 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 68.9 low | Low
2021 73.58 low | Low
Low
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds 10.53 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 19.0 low | Low
2021 10.53 low | Low
Low
Debt per capita 917.48 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 871.7 high | High
2021 917.48 high | High
High
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita -153.08 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 -124.0 low | Low
2021 -153.08 low | Low
Low
EU funds management - effected payments 44.0 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 23.5 high | High
2021 44.0 medium | Medium
Medium

2 Governance

P - Poor

Rating

30 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Molise
Sardegna
30/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor* 5
P+ - Weak 3
PP - Satisfactory 3
PP+ - Good 8
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Court of Auditors - update

Weaknesses

  • Open data availability
  • E- Government
  • Public works incompleted
  • Subsidiary companies

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Open data availability 62.0 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1542.0 high | High
2021 62.0 low | Low
Low
E- Government 2.4 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.0 low | Low
2021 2.4 low | Low
Low
Degree of digitization 0.96 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 8.4 medium | Medium
2021 0.96 medium | Medium
Medium
Target achievement 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Smart Working 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Public works incompleted 12.86 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 14.65 low | Low
2021 12.86 low | Low
Low
Public Real Estate properties - wide report 1,010.0 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.0 low | Low
2021 1010.0 medium | Medium
Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management -1.0 4
Year Value Evaluation
2020 -0.95 medium | Medium
2021 -1.0 medium | Medium
Medium
Subsidiary companies 56.25 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Anti-corruption measures undertaken 12.6 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 14.5 medium | Medium
2021 12.6 medium | Medium
Medium
Court of Auditors - update 2.0 8
Year Value Evaluation
High

3 Personnel management

P+ - Weak

Rating

46 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Lombardia
95/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
23/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor 4
P+ - Weak* 5
PP - Satisfactory 5
PP+ - Good 4
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel

Weaknesses

  • Personnel with a degree on total personnel

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expenditure 151.19 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 65.7 medium | Medium
2021 151.19 medium | Medium
Medium
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure 3.56 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.6 high | High
2021 3.56 medium | Medium
Medium
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure 0.27 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.3 medium | Medium
2021 0.27 medium | Medium
Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel 0.0 10
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.3 medium | Medium
2021 0.0 high | High
High
Average age 53.97 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 53.3 medium | Medium
2021 53.97 medium | Medium
Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel 37.6 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Average days of absence (sick leave) 9.07 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 9.5 low | Low
2021 9.07 medium | Medium
Medium
Managers on population 0.7 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers 97.95 5
Year Value Evaluation
2020 100.0 low | Low
2021 97.95 medium | Medium
Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.

4 Public services and relations with citizens

P - Poor

Rating

35 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

88/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 0
P - Poor* 6
P+ - Weak 4
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good 5
PPP - Very Good 2
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Hospital emigration
  • Accredited private health care centers
  • Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties

Weaknesses

  • Online services
  • Landline high-speed internet access covering
  • Integrated home care services
  • Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services and relations with citizens

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Online services 19.0 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 5.0 low | Low
2021 19.0 low | Low
Low
Landline high-speed internet access covering 14.6 1
Year Value Evaluation
Low
Hospital emigration 6.4 8
Year Value Evaluation
High
Beds in nursing homes (BES) 51.8 4
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
Integrated home care services 1.2 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 0.3 low | Low
2021 1.2 low | Low
Low
Accredited private health care centers 1.92 8
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.68 high | High
2021 1.92 high | High
High
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita 141.1 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 14222.58 low | Low
2021 141.1 low | Low
Low
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties 3.0 6
Year Value Evaluation
High
Citizens involvement 2.6 3
Year Value Evaluation
2020 45.0 high | High
2021 2.6 medium | Medium
Medium
FOIA register: accepted requests 86.7 2
Year Value Evaluation
Medium
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.

5 Public tenders and relations with suppliers

P - Poor

Rating

21 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
84/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
44/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
17/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 1
P - Poor* 9
P+ - Weak 3
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good 3
PPP - Very Good 1
PPP+ - Excellent 0

Strengths

  • Timeliness of payments indicator

Weaknesses

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders and relations with suppliers

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Timeliness of payments indicator -11.41 16
Year Value Evaluation
2020 -9.87 high | High
2021 -11.41 high | High
High
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens 0
Year Value Evaluation
N.A.
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year 75.0 5
Year Value Evaluation
Medium

6 Environment

PP+ - Good

Rating

64 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
94/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
55/100
Worst score
Liguria
18/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Rating class Number of administrations
ND - Unavailable 0
F - Fallible 1
P - Poor 3
P+ - Weak 5
PP - Satisfactory 4
PP+ - Good* 6
PPP - Very Good 1
PPP+ - Excellent 1

Strengths

  • Air quality - PM 2.5
  • Land consumption
  • Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering
  • Population exposed to landslide risk

Weaknesses

  • Contaminated sites
  • Population exposed to flood risk

Indicators of the macro-indicator Environment

Indicator name Value Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 37.5 12
Year Value Evaluation
High
Land consumption 3.3 12
Year Value Evaluation
High
Contaminated sites 12.4 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 9.0 low | Low
2021 12.4 low | Low
Low
Urban waste disposal into dump 22.4 7
Year Value Evaluation
2020 25.4 medium | Medium
2021 22.4 medium | Medium
Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering 3.3 12
Year Value Evaluation
2020 3.76 high | High
2021 3.3 high | High
High
Population exposed to landslide risk 1.4 12
Year Value Evaluation
2020 1.4 high | High
2021 1.4 high | High
High
Population exposed to flood risk 7.1 1
Year Value Evaluation
2020 7.1 low | Low
2021 7.1 low | Low
Low
Renewable energy 34.2 7
Year Value Evaluation
2020 34.2 medium | Medium
2021 34.2 medium | Medium
Medium