• Rating classes

  • PPP+ - Excellent (90, 100)
  • PPP - Very Good (80, 89)
  • PP+ - Good (60, 79)
  • PP - Satisfactory (50, 59)
  • P+ - Weak (40, 49)
  • P - Poor (20, 39)
  • F - Fallible (1, 19)
Public Administration

Sardegna

Compare
Comparative values by:
Download report
Download all data

SYNTHETIC INDEX OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY

P - Poor

Rating

39 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
71/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
53/100
Worst score
Molise
33/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Administrative capacity Index: summary of the 6 macro-indicators

Administrative Capacity Index

Details of the indicators by individual macro-indicators

1 Financial situation

PP - Satisfactory
Download all data

Rating

51 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
91/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Basilicata
20/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Financial autonomy
  • Collection capacity
  • Debt per capita

Weaknesses

  • Financial pressure per capita
  • New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities
  • Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds
  • Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita

Indicators of the macro-indicator Financial situation

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Financial autonomy % 96.34 High score for high values 8 Alto
Financial pressure per capita € p.c. 4,482.34 High score for low values 1 Basso
Collection capacity % 95.78 High score for high values 10 Alto
Spending capacity % 88.98 High score for high values 5 Medium
Spending rigidity % 4.25 High score for low values 5 Medium
Coverage of current expenditure and loan repayments through current revenues % 92.22 High score for high values 4 Medium
New liabilities generated in the current period on the accumulated current liabilities % 73.58 High score for low values 1 Basso
Capital account expenditure financed by loans and bonds % 10.53 High score for low values 1 Basso
Debt per capita € p.c. 917.48 High score for low values 10 Alto
Deficit/surplus on health expenditure per capita € p.c. -153.08 High score for high values 1 Basso
EU funds management - effected payments % 44.0 High score for high values 5 Medium

2 Governance

P - Poor
Download all data

Rating

30 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
Piemonte
82/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
56/100
Worst score
Molise
Sardegna
30/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Court of Auditors - update

Weaknesses

  • Open data availability
  • E- Government
  • Public works incompleted
  • Subsidiary companies

Indicators of the macro-indicator Governance

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Open data availability value 62.0 High score for high values 1 Basso
E- Government value 2.4 High score for high values 1 Basso
Degree of digitization value 0.96 High score for high values 5 Medium
Target achievement value High score for high values 0 N.D.
Smart Working value High score for high values 0 N.D.
Public works incompleted % 12.86 High score for low values 1 Basso
Public Real Estate properties - wide report value 1,010.0 High score for high values 4 Medium
Public Real Estate properties - management € p.c. -1.0 High score for high values 4 Medium
Subsidiary companies % 56.25 High score for high values 1 Basso
Anti-corruption measures undertaken value 12.6 High score for high values 5 Medium
Court of Auditors - update value 2.0 High score for low values 8 Alto

3 Personnel management

P+ - Weak
Download all data

Rating

46 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Lombardia
95/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
23/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel

Weaknesses

  • Personnel with a degree on total personnel

Indicators of the macro-indicator Personnel management

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Per capita personnel expenditure € p.c. 151.19 High score for low values 5 Medium
Personnel expenditure on current expenditure % 3.56 High score for low values 5 Medium
Expenditure for external advisory on personnel expenditure % 0.27 High score for low values 5 Medium
Personnel with fixed-term contract on total personnel % 0.0 High score for low values 10 Alto
Average age years old 53.97 High score for low values 5 Medium
Personnel with a degree on total personnel % 37.6 High score for high values 1 Basso
Average days of absence (sick leave) average days 9.07 High score for low values 5 Medium
Managers on population ‱ 0.7 High score for low values 5 Medium
Provided bonus out of allocated ones to managers % 97.95 High score for low values 5 Medium
Degree of differentiation of bonus paid to managers value High score for high values 0 N.D.

4 Public services and relations with citizens

P - Poor
Download all data

Rating

35 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Emilia-Romagna
88/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
54/100
Worst score
Molise
24/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Hospital emigration
  • Accredited private health care centers
  • Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties

Weaknesses

  • Online services
  • Landline high-speed internet access covering
  • Integrated home care services
  • Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public services and relations with citizens

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Efficiency indicator - reporting (multivariable) code High score for high values 0 N.D.
Efficiency indicator - timing supervision (multivariable) code High score for high values 0 N.D.
Online services value 19.0 High score for high values 1 Basso
Landline high-speed internet access covering % 14.6 High score for high values 1 Basso
Hospital emigration % 6.4 High score for low values 8 Alto
Beds in nursing homes (BES) ‱ 51.8 High score for high values 4 Medium
Integrated home care services % 1.2 High score for high values 1 Basso
Accredited private health care centers value 1.92 High score for low values 8 Alto
Territorial pharmaceutical expenditure per capita € p.c. 141.1 High score for low values 1 Basso
Planning of renewal of disused public RE properties value 3.0 High score for high values 6 Alto
Citizens involvement value 2.6 High score for high values 3 Medium
FOIA register: accepted requests % 86.7 High score for high values 2 Medium
FOIA register: average time of reply to requests days High score for low values 0 N.D.

5 Public tenders and relations with suppliers

P - Poor
Download all data

Rating

21 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
Liguria
84/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
44/100
Worst score
Abruzzo
17/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Timeliness of payments indicator

Weaknesses

Indicators of the macro-indicator Public tenders and relations with suppliers

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Recurring contractors in direct procurements % High score for low values 0 N.D.
Direct procurements on global public tenders - number % High score for low values 0 N.D.
Direct procurements on global public tenders - amount % High score for low values 0 N.D.
Timeliness of payments indicator average days -11.41 High score for low values 16 Alto
Per capita debt amount vs suppliers € High score for low values 0 N.D.
Number of corporate creditors per 10k citizens value High score for low values 0 N.D.
Settlement of commercial debts incurred during the fiscal year % 75.0 High score for high values 5 Medium

6 Environment

PP+ - Good
Download all data

Rating

64 out of 100

Chronological trend

Benchmark score

Benchmark
P.A. Bolzano
94/100
Average score of the Public Administrations
55/100
Worst score
Liguria
18/100

Distribution of Public Administrations with respect to the rating class

Strengths

  • Air quality - PM 2.5
  • Land consumption
  • Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering
  • Population exposed to landslide risk

Weaknesses

  • Contaminated sites
  • Population exposed to flood risk

Indicators of the macro-indicator Environment

Indicator name Unit of measure Value Scoring criteria Score Trend Evaluation of the indicator
Air quality - PM 2.5 % 37.5 High score for low values 12 Alto
Land consumption % 3.3 High score for low values 12 Alto
Contaminated sites thousandths 12.4 High score for low values 1 Basso
Urban waste disposal into dump % 22.4 High score for low values 7 Medium
Soil waterproofing due to artificial covering % 3.3 High score for low values 12 Alto
Population exposed to landslide risk % 1.4 High score for low values 12 Alto
Population exposed to flood risk % 7.1 High score for low values 1 Basso
Renewable energy % 34.2 High score for high values 7 Medium